Monday, 2 June 2014

World Cup predictions: economists fear England's group of death

England team photo ahead of the 2014 Brazil World Cup
England team photo ahead of the 2014 Brazil World Cup. 'It will be tough for England to qualify from this group but, if they do, they should have a decent chance to at least reach the quarter finals,' say PwC. Photograph: Action Images / Pool Pic
The dismal science has taken another look at the beautiful game, with economists at PwC the latest to put out predictions on the World Cup.
By "analysing all the key variables", the consultancy has concludedEngland finds itself in a "group of death" and will have a tough fight to progress beyond the group stage in Brazil.
John Hawksworth, UK chief economist at PwC, comments: "Group D has the highest total combined score on our index and is therefore deemed to be the 'Group of Death'. This reflects the strong collective footballing tradition of Uruguay, England and Italy – three countries in the top 10 of the all-time World Cup table that between them have won seven of the previous 19 World Cups.
"It will be tough for England to qualify from this group but, if they do, they should have a decent chance to at least reach the quarter finals."
The report follows an analysis by Goldman Sachs last week that predicted host nation Brazil will beat Argentina 3-1 in the final of the 2014 World Cup, while England will not make it beyond the group stages.
Meanwhile, Prof Stephen Hawking has unveiled formulae on the optimal conditions for England success in Brazil.
The PwC World Cup Index ranks the team eighth in terms of relative prospects in the tournament. Brazil are top, followed by Germany, Argentina, Spain and Colombia.
The report considers factors such as historical performance, home advantage and the number of players available in a country. It predicts Germany, Argentina and Spain will push the favourite, Brazil.
"This suggests a relatively lower chance of success for Brazil than the 48.5% probability estimated in a recent Goldman Sachs report, which seems high given the strength of the opposition and the element of good fortune in any individual football match," it adds.
Turning to economics, the report finds few clues to footballing success in nations' prosperity.
"In the Olympics, our previous analysis showed that money can buy you success. But in the World Cup, we found little evidence of any such effect as middle income countries such as Brazil and Argentina can do at least as well as richer European nations like Germany, France and the UK," said Hawksworth.
"Footballing tradition is more important than GDP in driving World Cup success: in that sense, the beautiful game is a great leveller."

GlaxoSmithKline reaches deal with UK firm developing cancer treatments

A GlaxoSmithKline research centre, Villebon Sur Yvette, France - 07 Sep 2010
A GlaxoSmithKline research centre in France. Photograph: Sipa Press/Rex Features
GlaxoSmithKline has struck a multimillion dollar deal with a British biotech firm to develop cutting-edge cancer treatments, after a new flurry of activity in the pharmaceutical sector.
Adaptimmune said that the deal could net it $350m (£209m) over seven years, as well as royalty payments on any products that get to market.
The Oxford-based firm, which develops cell therapies that help the body fight cancer, said trials in the US had shown encouraging results, while it was also poised to begin trials in Europe.
In April GSK agreed to sell its portfolio of cancer drugs to Novartis for $16bn, but left the door open to further oncology research.
GSK's tie-up with Adaptimmune comes as AstraZeneca announced promising results from early-stage trials of two ovarian cancer drugs.
When used in combination, olaparib and cediranib have been shown to stop the growth of tumours in women with the disease, AstraZeneca told investors at a oncology conference in Chicago at the weekend.
The drugs are among a number of promising treatments in the pipeline that the firm used to defend itself against an unwanted takeover by Pfizer, which was forced to drop its bid last week. As part of AstraZeneca's defence strategy its chief executive, Pascal Soriot, pledged a 75% increase in annual sales to $45bn (£27bn) by 2023, with the new cancer drugs playing a significant role in the forecasts.
Although the Pfizer bid failed, merger frenzy in the pharmaceutical sector continues, with reports that London-listed Shire is preparing a bid for NPS Pharmaceuticals, a US firm that has developed a breakthrough treatment for a debilitating bowel condition. The Times reported on Monday that Shire has lined up a $5bn credit facility from banks led by Citigroup to finance its takeover bid.
Shire, which is itself thought to be a target for acquisitionpaid $4.2bn last year to acquire rare diseases specialist ViroPharma and its lucrative pipeline of products.
"We do not comment on rumour and speculation," said a spokesperson when asked about a bid for NPS Pharmaceuticals.
In a further sign of investor interest in life sciences, Imperial Innovations, an investment vehicle with a portfolio of 96 life science and technology firms, announced a fundraising drive to raise money for some of its most promising ventures.
The firm, which is listed on London's smaller AIM exchange, hopes to raise £150m from big institutional investors by the end of the month. Potential recipients of the funds include Veryan Medical, the third largest company in its portfolio, which grew out of a research project at Imperial College London.
Veryan has developed a stent – a metal mesh tube inserted in an artery – that mimics the natural swirl of the blood flow, which researchers have found improves outcomes for patients with circulation problems.
Another company to benefit from the fundraising drive will be PsiOxus, where researchers from Imperial College and the University of Oxford are developing treatments that use the body's immune system to destroy cancerous cells.
"We are investing more capital into companies we know well, where the technology has been de-risked somewhat," said Imperial Innovations' chief executive, Russell Cummings. Some of the funds will also be targeted at new companies, he added.
Imperial Innovations starts around four to six companies a year with its four partner universities – Imperial College London, Oxford, Cambridge, and University College London – but that number of startups could rise to eight.

Airlines accused of 'being embarrassed' of profits as earnings forecasts rise

britishairways
The airline industry expects global profits to reach $18bn (£11bn) in 2014 – the highest ever in absolute terms. Photograph: Matthew Lloyd/Getty Images
Willie Walsh, the chief executive of British Airways' parent company,International Airlines Group, has accused airlines of "being embarrassed to make profits" and worrying that passengers would "bitch and moan" about high margins.
His comments came as the industry announced it expected global profits to reach $18bn (£11bn) in 2014. The figure is the highest ever in absolute terms and a steep rise on previous years despite persistently high fuel prices.
However, Tony Tyler, the director general of the International Air Transport Association (IATA), said at its AGM in Doha that the headline figures masked a daily struggle for airlines to break even.
The IATA has shaved $700m off its forecast due to concerns about China, but profits are up from $10.6bn in 2013, and almost three times the 2012 figure, as total spending on air travel rose to $746bn.
But Tyler said: "The brutal economic reality is that on revenues of $746bn we will earn an average net margin of just 2.4%. That's less than $6 per passenger.
"Some airlines will do better. But even if you're smart or lucky enough to be one of those, every day is still a struggle to keep revenues ahead of costs."
Walsh said airlines had a problem. He said: "We should not be embarrassed by saying we are trying to generate much higher profits than we are. This is the problem with our industry. A 2.4% margin – people would laugh at you in other industries."
He said other sectors made margins of 30-50%. "People buy their products and don't bitch and moan about it.
"We as the providers of this service almost feel embarrassed to talk about profitability and some of the people that buy our product don't think we should be allowed to make a profit. It's madness and it has to finish.
"You get people who will pay tens of thousands for a car or fortunes for watches. You don't hear people say: 'What was the margin on the watch I just bought?'"
The rise in profits has come despite fuel costs and relatively slow growth. Brian Pearce, the IATA's chief economist, said: "It's remarkable that the industry is generating any profit at all."
Airline fortunes closely mirror world trade and business confidence, which had been growing, he said. "In the first quarter of the year there has been a faltering of that upturn. We think it will resume but it shows we are still in fragile conditions."
Fuel costs have spurred the industry to achieve an extra 1.9% efficiency this year, but most airline chief executives agreed that fuel – at nearly $110 for a barrel of oil – was a major barrier to profit.
Ivan Chu of Cathay Pacific said: "It's a major part of your costs and something you can't control and very volatile, and the last few years the price has been very high."
Walsh agreed: "The issue is volatility. In 2001 a barrel of oil was $21.47 and we were unprofitable as an industry. Last year it was 32% of our costs and we were profitable."
Employees have borne the brunt of much cost-cutting. At International Airlines Group, new contracts at BA and Iberia have sliced salaries and introduced tougher conditions for crew and pilots.
Andrés Conesa, the chief executive of Aeroméxico, said labour had dropped from 35% to 22% of his airline's costs.
The chief executive of Qatar Airways, Akbar al-Baker – who said his close relationship with Walsh would bring another joint venture between the two airlines, but did not elaborate – said airlines should not recognise unions. "They are a pain in the ass. Everybody agrees but a lot of them would be afraid to say that I'm right."
Walsh said: "We have to live with the fact that we've got a trade union but are as determined as ever to run our business efficiently."
Intense competition from low-cost carriers has seen air fares fall in real terms by 3.5% this year, with the number of passengers worldwide reaching 3.3 billion.
Planes are flying fuller than ever before but lower fares mean that a higher load factor – or percentage of occupied seats – is needed to break even.
Tyler said consolidation had played a part in making the sector viable although national controls on foreign ownership had prevented many possible mergers.
However, he said: "By creatively working together – through alliances, joint ventures, franchising and domestic consolidation – we are seeing some significant results."
Walsh said: "The joint venture is a poor substitute but it's the only way in certain markets."
He said that while International Airlines Group had been looking at other airlines, to consolidate further, there was "not an opportunity at the moment".
Tyler warned that there were "strong headwinds" from rising infrastructure costs and inefficiencies in air traffic management, as well as the industry's perennial complaints about a heavy tax burden and costly regulation.
US airlines are making sustained recoveries after a wave of bankruptcies and consolidation. But David Barger, the chief executive of the US low-cost carrier JetBlue, said profits were going more to airports and financiers than airlines. "We're in the wrong part of the food chain."
Margins for airlines in Europe will be about half the global average, at 1.3%. But as Pearce pointed out, in the precarious world of airlines the average profit margin for the last 20 years is zero.

Tougher oversight of foreign exchange market expected to be unveiled

Chancellor George Osborne
George Osborne's speech this year in front of London's financial community comes as investigations into claims of rigging of foreign exchange market. Photograph: Oli Scarff/Getty Images
The chancellor, George Osborne, is expected to announce measures to increase oversight of the £3tn-a-day foreign exchange market as investigations continue into the latest allegations of benchmark-fixing in the City.
Osborne could unveil the changes on 12 June in his Mansion House speech, an annual set piece in front of London's financial community, where he will appear alongside the Bank of England governor, Mark Carney. Both men have stated their desire to clean up Britain's banking industry.
Under the proposals manipulation of the foreign exchange market could be subjected to the same, toughened regime as for Libor. The government acted last year to bring setting of the Libor interest rate within the remit of statutory regulation for the first time, making attempted manipulation of the benchmarker a criminal offence.
A Treasury spokesman declined to comment on the details or exact timing of any announcement by Osborne, which was first reported by the BBC. The spokesman said the Treasury was keen to influence new international rules on benchmarks for financial instruments.
"Ensuring confidence in the fairness and effectiveness of financial markets is central … which is why we've taken action to reform Libor, and why we're now using the lessons we have learned here to inform and shape the important ongoing global debate on benchmark reform," he said.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB), a global body chaired by Carney, is expected to report next month on how to improve currency fixings. The UK's Financial Conduct Authority is conducting an investigation into the foreign exchange market, with the US department of justice also launching an inquiry.
Last week Carney said he wanted the FSB to recommend changes that would affect how markets set benchmarks such as Libor and foreign exchange fixings.
"Merely prosecuting the guilty to the full extent of the law will not be sufficient to address the issues raised. Authorities and market participants must also act to recreate fair and effective markets," he said in a speech.
In March the Bank of England suspended a member of staff in connection with its review of the foreign exchange market and launched a formal inquiry into whether its staff knew about potential market rigging.
Speaking to MPs the same month, Carney said the Bank was "ruthlessly and relentlessly" investigating what had happened in foreign exchange markets.
He said the alleged rigging could become a worse scandal than Libor, telling MPs: "This is as serious as Libor, if not more so, because this goes to the heart of integrity of markets. We cannot come out of this with a shadow of doubt about the integrity of the Bank of England."

Clouded future: Tap and tax the informal economy

Tea smugglers that don’t pay any tax deprive the national kitty of more than Rs8.7 billion a year in potential revenue, according to the Pakistan Tea Association. PHOTO: FILE/REUTERS
KARACHI: The government is all set to announce the federal budget for fiscal year 2014-2015 on Tuesday, June 3. Whether it pleases or disappoints various stakeholders will be learned shortly but rumour mills are already spinning regarding the new levies and increase in existing taxes.
Taxation, a necessary evil, is important to run the country. What, however, largely disappoints the stakeholders – be it the corporate sector, salaried class or just a consumer – is the government’s failure to increase the tax net, while imposing further taxes on those already paying heavy amounts.
Recent budget proposals suggest the government is once again heading towards increasing the tax burden of those already paying very high taxes on their income and purchases.
There is no denying that the cash-strapped economy desperately needs money. However, this can also be achieved by tapping the county’s informal economy, which is not only hindering development but also depriving the former of much-needed taxes.
Pakistan’s $225 billion Gross Domestic Product (GDP), according to various estimates, is only half of the country’s overall economy. Simply put, the country’s undocumented economy is as big as its formal one – on a conservative side, Pakistan’s informal economy is 36% of its overall economy, according to a 2012-report by Bloomberg.
This large informal economy is an opportunity at the same time if the government is really serious about increasing its tax net. There are several areas where the government can increase regulation and enforcement in order to increase its revenue base.
Looking at the telecom sector, which is one of the highest tax-paying sectors of the formal economy. In fiscal year 2012-2013, the telecom sector paid Rs.125 billion or $1.2 billion in taxes – slightly more than what the government earned from the much-hyped 3G auction.
Increasing taxes on the telecom services will only make services unaffordable for the poor and hurt the revenues of the industry, hindering a country-wide penetration of mobile broadband – mobile phone users are already paying 15% withholding tax, 19.5% federal excise duty (FED) or general sales tax (GST) on cellular services.
By contrast, if the federation can curb the menace of grey telephony, it can nearly double its tax collection from telecom sector – as per latest estimates, more than half of the total international traffic to Pakistan is illegally terminated, which costs the exchequer more than $1 billion a year.
Illegal tea trade – which accounts for more than a third, half by some estimates, of the total tea market – is another part of the informal economy that can be brought under the tax net.
Tea smugglers that don’t pay any tax deprive the national kitty of more than Rs8.7 billion or $84 million a year in potential revenues, according to the Pakistan Tea Association.
Likewise, illicit tobacco trade can be another target area for the tax watchdog – illegal tobacco trade is one-fourth of the total cigarettes consumed in Pakistan, according to an international study: Asia-11, Illicit Tobacco Indicator 2012.
If brought under the tax net, this could earn the Pakistani government $275 million in FY13 in potential taxes, according to Asia-11 study.
Similarly, dairy sector is another area that can be tapped. The formal dairy sector is hardly 10% of the country’s total milk trade yet it paid $28 million in income tax last year alone. By contrast, the informal sector, which is more than 90% of the fresh milk trade, remains completely undocumented and untaxed.
There are thousands of milk shops across the country – among them are players with sales of over 2,000 litres a day. Additionally, there are people who own multiple shops or an entire chain of milk shops. This undocumented segment – barring very few players – can be taxed on their incomes.
These are only a handful of examples but there are dozens, if not hundreds, of other tax opportunities in the informal sector, which the government can tap.
However, reducing the size of the undocumented economy is real work for the regulators, particularly for the exchequer. This is, perhaps, why they seem to have chosen an easy route — squeezing those already taxed and that, too, at exorbitant rates.

Here's An Inside Look At Elon Musk's Dragon V2 Spaceship

At its California headquarters, SpaceX has unveiled the upgraded version of its Dragon spaceship, a capsule that will potentially be used to carry astronauts into orbit.

Shorealone Films photographer Matt Hartman was there and took these images.
The new capsule, whose shape is reminiscent of the Apollo command module, is equipped with 8 powerful engines and landing legs that make precision touchdowns, like those performed by helicopters, possible. Rather than parachuting into the ocean the new spaceship can hypothetically land on any kind of surface.
“That is how a 21st century spaceship should land,” said SpaceX founder and Chief Executive Elon Musk.
The Dragon v2, launched by a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket, will initially fly without passengers at the end of next year. Its first piloted flight is planned for 2016.
The reusable spaceship could be used to launch NASA’s astronauts into space, thereby restoring the U.S.'s ability to launch and recover its astronauts.
The U.S. lost this capability after the Space Shuttles were retired in 2011. Since then, American astronauts have traveled to the International Space Station via Russia’s Soyuz. This costs the U.S. some $60 million per astronaut.
Along with the SNC Dream Chaser and the Boeing CST-100, SpaceX Dragon is one of the three commercial spaceflight transportation systems currently being developed with the financial and technical support of NASA. NASA will eventually select one or two of these projects to launch humans into space beginning in 2017.
The predecessor of the new Dragon v2 capsule, SpaceX’s Dragon spacecraft (Space Shuttle Orbiter replacement), recently completed the third commercial resupply mission and fourth visit to the International Space Station with a launch from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station (closely followed by the Russian ocean tug “Nikolay Chiker”).
This article originally appeared at The Aviationist. Copyright 2014. Follow The Aviationist on Twitter.


Read more: http://theaviationist.com/2014/06/02/spacex-unveils-dragon-v2/#ixzz33WHrefLT

John Legere: How The T-Mobile CEO Is Poised To Make Millions

John Legere T-Mobile Portrait Illustration
Mike Nudelman/Business Insider
T-Mobile CEO John Legere.
A few weeks ago, there was a boozy party on the rooftop of the Empire Hotel, which overlooks Lincoln Center on the west side of Manhattan.
Waitresses in heels, tights, and short dresses served plates of sliders to guests. Some of the walls had been painted pink, while the rest of the venue was bathed in a pinkish hue from a series of spotlights dotted along the floor. A DJ played dance music mixed with some top-40 tunes. There was an open bar. 
But the party attendees didn't match the clubby vibe. The rooftop was full of men in blazers, slacks, and dress shirts. Women wore business casual skirts and blouses. Company people and nine-to-fivers. I saw one guy sit alone and choke down two plates of sliders. It was like watching a bunch of nerds socialize after being asked out for the first time.
The party was sponsored by T-Mobile, a way for the carrier to court its B2B customers with plenty of booze and free food. And the star of the event wasn't Mark Messier, the Hall of Fame hockey player T-Mobile hired to make an appearance. It was T-Mobile's CEO John Legere. The stuffy B2B customers ate him up. They posed for selfies. They talked about wonky topics like wireless spectrum and data usage overseas. They told him how much they loved his tweets.
I watched Legere, wearing his trademark uniform of a black jacket over a pink T-Mobile shirt, jeans, and pink Converse All Star sneakers play the crowd with a mix of swagger and legitimate concern for his customers. If one had a question or interesting idea, he would whip out a stack of business cards, which include his personal cellphone number, and give one out.
"Email me," he'd say.
In the year and a half since Legere took over as CEO, T-Mobile, which was on the verge of collapse and at risk of being stripped down and sold for spectrum, has made a remarkable turnaround. It's growing faster than its competitors in terms of revenue and subscribers. And there's a very good chance it'll soon get scooped up in a merger with Sprint, making the combined company a strong contender to AT&T and Verizon.
It'd also make Legere very, very rich.
After Legere (pronounced ledge-er) schmoozed with customers for a bit, we took the elevator down to a hotel room on the ninth floor for a chat. He took off his jacket, sipped on his beer, and pointed out the window to a swanky apartment building across the street.
"That's my place," he said.
It's that kind of boasting and showmanship that has helped turn T-Mobile into a branding story just as much as it is the story of a company coming back from the brink of collapse. Whether Legere's gratuitous swearing, toying with the press, and public shaming of his competitors is a gimmick or not is almost irrelevant. The company has the spotlight now, the allure of a scrappy startup trying to disrupt two giants that have done nothing but annoy their customers with confusing contracts, overage charges, and painful device upgrade cycles.
Since Legere took over in late 2012, his plan has been to pick apart those annoyances one at a time in what the company calls its "uncarrier" moves. Contracts? Gone. Want a new phone? Upgrade whenever you want, as long as you've paid off your first device. Tired of getting a massive bill every time you travel overseas? Free 2G data and texting should help. 
Those changes, Legere said, didn't come out of nowhere. T-Mobile listened to what the market wanted and gave it to them. The plan is to pick off complaints consumers have with their carriers one by one. More changes are coming, too. On June 18, T-Mobile will announce "Uncarrier 5," its fifth major offer designed to lure in customers. Legere told me at least "two or three more" such changes are coming after that.
"People always think we're going to announce highly elaborate things," Legere said. "I'll tell you that when we announce what we're going to do next, it's going to be right in front of you. They're the most obvious, right-in-front-of-your-face things that when we do them, it's highly elegant and it works."
Legere bragged that he doesn't even need a plan. In theory, he could announce a change is coming, then analyze the social media and blog chatter to see what customers want. (That's probably an oversell from Legere, but it does demonstrate that the carrier's short-term strategy is to rapidly draw in new subscribers by framing its plans and offers as hassle-free alternatives to what AT&T, Sprint, and Verizon sell.)
T-Mobile may be the annoying mosquito buzzing in its competitors' ears, but the competitors keep swatting at it. And anything that makes Verizon and AT&T, which combined own nearly 70% of the U.S. wireless market, twitch is going to be good for consumers. 
And the competition appears to be following T-Mobile's lead. In the months since T-Mobile eliminated service contracts and created a program that lets you effectively lease your smartphone through monthly payments, AT&T, Verizon, and Sprint each launched similar plans. For many though, T-Mobile is an attractive option. Its network isn't as robust as AT&T or Verizon's, but its plans are cheaper and easier to understand. (Verizon and AT&T still have so many caveats, extras, asterisks, and options that you need an encyclopedia to decipher it all.)
t-mobile ceo john legere
T-Mobile
Industry insiders I've spoken to aren't bullish on T-Mobile's long-term prospects. The carrier's moves may be good for consumers, but not the company's bottom line. Despite reporting impressive revenue and subscriber growth for the first quarter of the year, it's still losing money. Part of that is because T-Mobile launched a new promotion in January that will pay the cost to terminate your contract with your old carrier if you make the switch to T-Mobile. Those early termination fees (ETFs) can be several hundred dollars per user, depending on how long the contract has been in effect.
In essence, T-Mobile is buying customers away from its competitors. Legere said most customers who switched using the ETF deal cost the company about $200 a pop. But the offer is working, and T-Mobile is growing faster than its own lofty projections, Legere said. T-Mobile added about 2 million subscribers in the first quarter of this year alone.
"From a standpoint of what we set out to do at three-year growth targets, we're ahead," Legere said. "So there is gold in our hills. From the standpoint of this turning into significant operating cash flow, we're dead on track."
Legere seems to be aware of the realities of the business. Recently, T-Mobile raised the price of its top plan, which offers unlimited data, text, and calling, to $80 per month, a $10 increase. Legere knows things can change. Just because T-Mobile offers an unlimited data plan now, doesn't mean it will in the future if the economics of those plans shift out of the company's favor, he said.
"We haven't cast our identity on it," Legere said of unlimited plans. "We reserve the right to change that pricing and/or change whether we offer it or not. Unlimited is an offer for us, not our brand."
If you want to be cynical, you can say T-Mobile's moves over the last year and a half is a play to make the company as attractive as possible for a sale. It's not about building the best wireless carrier, but growing the number of subscribers at a rapid pace so that maybe, soon, someone will come along with an attractive offer.
And some industry insiders I've spoken to have pointed to Legere's past as evidence of that. Before becoming T-Mobile's CEO, Legere was the CEO of the telecommunications company Global Crossing, which like T-Mobile was nearly toast back in the early 2000s. Legere laid off thousands of employees while taking a $1.1 million salary plus a $3.5 million signing bonus. In a testy congressional hearing in 2002, Legere was asked by congresswoman Stephanie Tubs Jones how many Global Crossing jobs could've been saved with that signing bonus alone.
t-mobile CEO john legere at global crossing congressional hearing
C-SPAN
Legere at the 2002 congressional hearing on Global Crossing.
Legere had a snarky reply.
"As a rule, I don't do math in public," he told the congresswoman.
Global Crossing survived, and was sold in 2011 (the deal closed in 2012) to Level 3 Communications for $3 billion. Legere said he doesn't regret the moves he made to keep Global Crossing alive, including all the layoffs.
"The company was dead and one of my biggest successes at Global Crossing is I created a path forward for the company to survive," Legere said. "I remember telling the company at the time that it's not probable, but it's possible, and here's how we're going to do it. It was a very long road, ultimately."
There's an obvious echo to what happened under Legere's reign at Global Crossing to what's happening at T-Mobile now. According to several reports, Softbank, the Japanese company that owns a majority stake in Sprint, will announce a formal offer to buy T-Mobile. There are, of course, a bunch of regulatory hoops the carriers will have to jump through before the deal can be approved (AT&T failed to get the government's OK to buy T-Mobile a few years ago, after all), but if it does happen, the combined company will be a strong challenger to the Goliaths AT&T and Verizon.
Legere sees the similarities too. 
"If you really went back to my time at AT&T, Dell, and Global Crossing, I've always had a number of tasks that are either defining something new or fixing something broken," he said.
Legere also stands to make a lot of money by preparing T-Mobile for a sale. According to Aaron Boyd, an analyst at Equilar, which specializes in executive compensation, Legere could make over $41 million if T-Mobile sells to Sprint at its current stock price. According to one report from Bloomberg, there's talk that Legere may be the pick to be the CEO of a combined Sprint/T-Mobile.
Naturally, Legere can't comment directly on the potential merger with Sprint, but he did say such a combined venture would be much different than what AT&T wanted to do when it tried to buy T-Mobile. Back then, Legere said, it was all about AT&T snapping up more precious wireless spectrum. With Sprint, spectrum would play a significant part, but it's also about acquiring the team of executives Legere has built to turn T-Mobile around. In theory, that would create a much-needed challenger to keep AT&T and Verizon in check.
"If you took T-Mobile and gave it a huge amount of spectrum and the economic wherewithal and the scale to take on what we're doing, if I was AT&T or Verizon I'd s--- myself over that," Legere said.
But some of Legere's critics have told me in private that much of the company's turnaround is a lot of fluff, a marketing ploy to package the company for a sale after missing out the first time with AT&T. Legere is known for openly swearing in public and on social media. At the Consumer Electronics Show in January, he made a fat joke about Ralph de la Vega, the CEO of AT&T's mobile division. He's picked fights on Twitter with journalists and later deleted the tweets. He once quipped in front a group of journalists that they shouldn't try to hit on his daughter at a press event. And he takes every opportunity he can to troll his competitors with snarky public comments that sometimes contradict themselves.
Plus, he throws lavish parties for the press and customers with celebrities like Mark Messier and the rapper Macklemore.
"I don't walk closely up against the line. I ignore it. It's who I am," Legere said. "I may be a little rough and crude, but I'm much more like my customers and employees than I am an executive. I think employees relate to the way I speak, and customers relate exactly to the way I think I talk. It's part of being connected to what your customers want."
Still, it's working. When you're stuck at the bottom like T-Mobile was when Legere took over, you have to punch up in order to stand out. Otherwise, it's all over.
"This company was dead when I got here and the people needed to believe," Legere said. "I started at the top of the mountain and declared victory, day one."
It was a mission Legere had to sell to his board too: That he was going to be loud in public and relentlessly needle his competitors.
"I needed to change the culture of the owners of my board," Legere said. "I needed to make it clear as to where we could go if they would kind of just let go. And part of that behavior and that independence was a training session for everybody."
I asked Legere if T-Mobile's board had ever given him a slap on the wrist for something he did or said.
Legere leaned back in his chair a bit and waved his hand in the air.
"No, f--- 'em." he joked.