Tuesday, 8 April 2014

US gives Boeing green light to sell plane parts to Iran

US gives Boeing green light to sell plane parts to Iran
Boeing, the world's biggest plane manufacturer, said late Friday the US Treasury Department issued it with a license allowing the airline to do business with Iran for the first time since 1979.
A Boeing spokesman said the company would now be allowed to export certain spare parts for commercial planes that were needed to ensure older aircraft could fly safely. The license covers a limited period of time and does not allow Boeing to sell new planes to Iran.
The company will contact officials in Iran to determine which specific parts are needed. Boeing's last delivery to Iran was a 747-100 jumbo jet in August 1979, three months before US hostages were seized at the Tehran embassy.
The Islamic Revolution that year led to US sanctions that were later broadened over a dispute from Iran's nuclear activities.
Last year, Iran agreed to limit its nuclear operations in exchange for a temporary easing of severe economic sanctions from Britian, China, France, Germany, Russia and the US. A permanent agreement is currently being negotiated.
The sanctions were introduced to put pressure on Iran to reduce or halt the capability of it producing a nuclear weapon, an ambition that Iran has denied.
Iran has said that the sanctions have prevented it from renewing its airline fleet, forcing it to use sub-standard Russian aircraft and continuing to use planes that should have long been retired.

Kerry warns of US ‘reality check’ in brokering Middle East talks

Kerry warns of US ‘reality check’ in brokering Middle East talks
Kerry said there was a limit to Washington's commitment to efforts to broker a peace if the two sides themselves were not willing to move forward.
The Secretary of State declared late on Friday it was 'reality check time' as to whether an agreement could be reached. Kerry's comments came after what he described as unhelpful announcements by both the Israeli and Palestinian leadership.
'Regrettably in the last few days, both sides have taken steps that are not helpful, and that's evident to everybody. So we are going to evaluate very carefully exactly where this is and where it might possibly be able to go,' Kerry told reporters, while on a diplomatic visit to Morocco.
Kerry, who embarked on a last-ditch effort to save the floundering peace process last weekend, had been due to return to the Middle East on Wednesday, a day after attending the NATO summit in Brussels.
However, he cancelled after both parties made announcements that backtracked on preconditions for talks, placing the already-fragile negotiations in further jeopardy.
'No open-ended effort'
'There are limits to the amount of time and effort that the United States can spend if the parties themselves are unwilling to take constructive steps in order to be able to move forward,' said Kerry. 'Neither party has said that they've called it off. But we're not going to sit there indefinitely. This is not an open-ended effort… It's reality check time, and we intend to evaluate precisely what the next steps will be.'
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas on Tuesday signed 15 United Nations treaties and conventions that give his administration greater recognition. An agreement not to sign such documents had been a precondition set by Israel for talks to go ahead.
Earlier, Israel had said it would reissue 708 settlement tenders in the East Jerusalem neighborhood of Gilo. The Israeli government also called off its promised release of 26 Palestinian prisoners under conditions set for the talks by the Palestinians.
A source familiar with the talks told the Reuters news agency that Israeli and Palestinian negotiators were likely to meet, along with US envoy Martin Indyk on Sunday.

Can Rahul Gandhi revive India’s Congress party?

Can Rahul Gandhi revive India’s Congress party?
The government of Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has been hit by a series of corruption scandals in the past two years, which has severely damaged the popularity his Indian National Congress party. Analysts say Congress' chances to win the general elections in the second half of 2014 are quite low.
The ruling coaliton has been hit by a string of corruption scandals and is going through its roughest political patch in years since it returned to power in 2009. Last month, the Congress faced a debacle in the recent Delhi state elections. In other states, it was defeated by the main opposition party, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), which is cashing in on the rising anti-government sentiment.
The Congress' supporters believe that only one person can turn the fortunes of the party. His name is Rahul Gandhi, the son of the Congress's president, Sonia Gandhi.
The Gandhis are one of the most influential political dynasties in the South Asian nation. Rahul's father Rajiv Gandhi, his grandmother Indira Gandhi, and great grandfather Jawaharlal Nehru were all prime ministers of India.
Rahul joined politics in 2004 and became a member of parliament after winning the seat for Amethi town in the northern Uttar Pradesh state.
A reluctant politician
Rahul has been critiziced for what analysts regard as his reluctance to lead the Congress party. Pradip Datta, a political scientist at the University of Delhi, says Rahul knows that he will eventually lead the Congress, but is deliberately using the image of a reluctant politician.
'Rahul, in a way, wants to show his aloofness to the corrupt world of politics, which, to a large extent, is identified with his own party,' Datta told DW. The expert also says that the 43-year-old has so far failed to prove that he is charismatic enough to mobilize the masses.
But as parliamentary elections draw closer, it will be difficult for Rahul to not take the reins of his party. And it seems that the Congress is aware of Rahul's importance in the upcoming elections.
Sonia Gandhi recently announced that her son will lead the Congress's election campaign, however, she fell short of announcing Rahul's name as candidate for the post of prime minister.
Jatin Gandhi, the deputy Editor of the India Today magazine, believes Rahul is the victim of his own image.
'Rahul realizes that the mood in India is against dynastical politics. He has been talking against it for the past ten years. Unfortunately, he has not been very successful in altering his image,' Gandhi told DW.
Challenges ahead
Aarthi Ramachandran, author of 'Decoding Rahul Gandhi' believes it is time for the Congress' politician to send a clear message that he is capable of leading the party and will form an effective and corruption-free government if they vote for him.
'He also needs to convey to Indians that he will be different from the current Congress leadership in New Delhi,' Ramachandran said. The author, however, fears that it won't be easy for him because he is seen as a key figure in the present government.
Also, Rahul faces tough competition from two politicians: Narendra Modi of the BJP and Arvind Kejriwal of the Common Man's party.
Kejriwal is now chief minister of Delhi after ending Congress' Sheila Dikshit's 15-year-rule in the state. Political commentators say the new party has given Indian voters an alternative in general elections.
On the other hand, the Hindu nationalist BJP's leader Narendra Modi is already considered favorite to win the elections. The chief minister of Gujarat is credited for the rapid economic growth in his state.
Experts believe that it won't be easy for the young Gandhi to revive the Congress party and change people's perceptions about it.

Afghans vote in landmark poll, undeterred by threats

Afghans vote in landmark poll, undeterred by threats
KABUL: Voting was largely peaceful in Afghanistan's presidential election on Saturday, with only isolated attacks on polling stations as a country racked by decades of chaos embarked on its first ever democratic transfer of power.
A roadside bomb killed two policemen and wounded two others in the southern city of Qalat as they were returning from a polling station, while four voters were wounded in an explosion at a voting centre in the southeastern province of Logar.
There were no reports of more serious attacks so far on an election that Taliban insurgents had vowed to derail, branding it a U.S.-backed sham.
The United States, having spent $90 billion on aid and training for Afghan security forces since it helped vanquish the Taliban in 2001, could point to its success promoting democracy as a major achievement toward leaving Afghanistan as a more stable country.
But the abiding Taliban threat, and uncertainty over neighbor Pakistan's intentions, leaves the worry that Afghanistan could enter a fresh cycle of violence, and once again become a haven for groups like al Qaeda, after the bulk of US troops leave by the year-end.
Most people expect the election will be better run than the chaotic 2009 vote that handed the outgoing president, Hamid Karzai, a second term amid massive fraud and ballot stuffing.
The stronger the next president's mandate, the less vulnerable Afghanistan could be to instability. Even if the election is less flawed this time, it could take months - perhaps even until October - for a winner to be declared at a time when the country desperately needs a leader to stem rising violence as foreign troops prepare to leave.
Nearly 3,500 members of the US-led coalition force have been killed in Afghanistan since deployment over a decade ago.
KABUL SEALED OFF
About 12 million are eligible to vote in the election, and there are eight candidates, with former foreign ministers Abdullah Abdullah and Zalmay Rassoul, and former finance minister Ashraf Ghani the favourites.
Karzai is barred by the constitution from running for the presidency again. But, after 12 years in power, he is widely expected to retain influence through politicians loyal to him.
The Taliban warned civilians ahead of the election they would be targeted if they try to vote, and dozens died in a spate of attacks in the preceding weeks.
A veteran Associated Press photographer was killed and a senior correspondent of the same news agency was wounded on Friday when a policeman opened fire on the two women in eastern Afghanistan as they reported on preparations for the poll.
More than 350,000 Afghan troops were deployed, guarding against attacks on polling stations and voters. The capital, Kabul, was sealed off by rings of roadblocks and checkpoints.
In the city of Kandahar, cradle of the Taliban insurgency, the mood was tense. Vehicles were not allowed to move on the roads and checkpoints were set up at every intersection.
Hamida, a 20-year-old teacher working at a Kandahar polling station, said more than a dozen women turned up in the first two hours of voting and added that she expected more to come despite the threat of an attack by the Taliban.
"We are trying not to think about it," she said, only her honey-brown eyes visible through her black niqab.
Raising questions about the legitimacy of the vote even before it began, the election commission announced that at least 10 percent of polling stations were expected to be shut due to security threats, and most foreign observers left Afghanistan in the wake of a deadly attack on a hotel in Kabul last month.
The interior ministry said six officials - including an intelligence agent - were detained on Saturday for trying to rig the vote, and elsewhere several people were arrested for trying to use fake voter cards.
RISK OF DELAY
One of the chief risks is the length of time it may take to declare a new president. If none of the candidates wins over 50 percent of the vote, the two frontrunners would go into a run-off on May 28, spinning out the process into the holy month of Ramadan when life slows to a crawl.
A long delay would leave little time to complete a pact between Kabul and Washington to keep up to 10,000 US troops in the country beyond 2014, after the bulk of the American force, which currently stands at around 23,500, has pulled out.
Karzai has rejected the pact, but the three frontrunners have pledged to sign it. Without the pact, far weaker Afghan forces would be left on their own to fight the Taliban.
Uncertainty over the outcome could also stall crucial foreign aid and economic reform, foment ethnic tensions and leave a political vacuum in which the Taliban could gain ground.
The election is a landmark after 13 years of struggle to quell an insurgency that has killed at least 16,000 Afghan civilians and thousands more soldiers.
Karzai's relations with the United States became increasingly strained in recent years as Afghan casualties mounted, and he voiced frustrated that Washington was not putting enough pressure on Pakistan to stop the Taliban, who base themselves in borderlands.
Although Karzai's departure is a turning point for Afghanistan, none of his would-be successors would bring radical change, Western diplomats say.
"The only positive thing in this election is that it is necessary to save the state as it is, and therefore there is a need to transfer power one way or the other," Sarah Chayes, a South Asia expert at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace told a media briefing on the eve of the vote.
"Whether the election will be the great transformative event that everybody expects is, I think, delusional."

Afghan army again fires 6 mortars into Pakistan

Afghan army again fires 6 mortars into Pakistan
MIRANSHAH: At least six mortar shells were fired from the Afghanistan side of the Pak-Afghan border on Saturday that landed in Pakistan’s bordering areas in North and South Waziristan Agency (NWA), but no loss of life reported.
Sources said that four mortar shells fired from Afghanistan landed at Bangidar in Tehsil Ghulam Khan of North Waziristan here, while two mortar shells were also fired into South Waziristan from Afghanistan. Fortunately, no loss of life reported in both the incidents
Earlier also Afghan forces had fired mortar shells into Pakistani territory several times. Only last week six mortar shells were fired from across the border from a check-post of Afghan National Army, landed near the Pakistani check-post in Ghulam Khan Sector in North Waziristan Agency (NWA).

Israel PM Netanyahu threatens ‘unilateral moves’ against Palestinians

Israel PM Netanyahu threatens ‘unilateral moves’ against Palestinians
Israel will retaliate if the Palestinians move forward with applications to adhere to 15 international treaties, Netanyahu said on Sunday.
'These will only make a peace agreement more distant,' he told a weekly cabinet meeting. 'Any unilateral moves they take will be answered by unilateral moves at our end.'
The prime minister did not specify what action he might take against the Palestinians, who last Tuesday submitted the 15 applications. Israel fears the action could give the Palestinians better leverage against them.
Stumbling talks
US Secretary of State John Kerry's Middle East envoy, Martin Indyk, on Sunday made a last-ditch attempt .
Israeli and Palestinian chief negotiations Tzipi Livni and Saeb Erekat were set to meet again late on Sunday with Indyk in Jerusalem. A similar meeting ended after nine hours last week with the two sides trading accusations.
The negotiations were resumed last July, with a deadline of April 29 this year.
The talks were plunged into crisis last week when Israel refused to release the fourth and final group of Palestinian prisoners, as part of an agreement with the US and the Palestinians.
In response, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas signed the applications for membership in United Nations agencies.
Speaking from Morocco on Friday, Kerry said there were 'limits' to how much the US could invest in the stumbling peace negotiations.
The White House said last week it was 'disappointed' by the actions from both sides, including the Palestinians' treaty applications and Israel's approval of further settlement construction in the West Bank, which is considered illegal by the international community.

Turkey losing faith in the European dream

Turkey losing faith in the European dream
For the last year, Turkey has been dogged by one of the worst domestic political crises in its history. It started with the countrywide protests sparked by the Gezi Park sit-in and continued with the Turkish government corruption scandal. It was then further exacerbated by the government's ban on YouTube and Twitter, which also greatly damaged Turkey's international reputation, especially in the European Union.
In light of these events, the results of the recent local elections in capital Ankara were surprising to many. Turkey's ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) received 46 percent of the vote. This prompted the EU to issue a statement in which it urged Turkey to concentrate on reforms in order to meet EU standards.
Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan's reaction to such criticism has been increasingly bolder and more dismissive. 'The financial crisis, the global crisis, the Arab Spring and the events in Syria and Egypt show that the EU needs Turkey more than Turkey does the EU,' he told reporters in Berlin in February.
Later, in response to the Twitter ban scandal, he said that he was indifferent to the international community's opinion - and that everyone would realize the power of the Republic of Turkey one day.
Falling interest in the EU
Turkey has been a candidate for EU accession since 2005. However, the country's interest in Europe appears to be waning. This was clear in the recent Transatlantic Trend survey, in which only 44 percent of Turks claimed to be in favor of EU membership. This represents a large drop from the 73-percent in-favor response in 2004. Today, every third Turk is against EU accession, while 10 years ago this figure was just 9 percent.
Many see the reason for this in the drawn-out accession process. 'No European country has ever needed this much time to become a member,' commented a law student at Istanbul Bilgi University in an interview with DW. 'Even after all these years, our chances are no better. On the contrary: the situation is increasingly worse.'
The 24-year-old said she was completely pro-European in the past, but now she has her doubts. 'The EU doesn't want us anyway - many of my fellow students share this view.'
Following all the domestic political scandals, Turkey's citizens seem to be losing hope. One recently twittered, 'Does the EU still consider the prospect of EU accession?' And another posted, 'I hope Turkey will join the EU in the coming years. This would make living here easier.'
According to businessman Güclü Gencer, Turkey's current economic situation is the main reason why 'successful businessmen' are losing interest in the EU. Gencer himself is one of Turkey's top entrepreneurs.
'The Turkish economy has grown significantly in the last 10 years,' Gencer told DW. 'The EU, on the other hand, has been grappling with the financial crisis.'
He added that he felt the EU had no plans to accept or reject Turkey, but rather simply wanted to maintain good relations.
'We already have trade agreements between the EU and Turkey anyway,' said Gencer. 'Apart from that, I think that the EU benefits more from Turkey than the other way around. Turkey is in a very strategically important position - this will always be of help to the EU.'
Domestic matters take priority
According to Senem Aydin, a political scientist at Istanbul Bilgi University, the EU currently doesn't enjoy great popularity in Turkey.
'This is partly due to the vague promises made by the EU and the unusually long accession process,' said Aydin. 'The people no longer believe that the EU is seriously considering Turkey's membership, especially because Turkey is a mostly Muslim country. They believe that Turkey can fulfill all the criteria but still won't become a member.'
Aydin added that even the Turkish elite, which has always been in favor of EU accession, is losing its enthusiasm. 'This is mostly due to the domestic political situation,' she explained. 'Turkey's secular elite is fighting for political survival, for maintaining what power it still has. The EU is out of the focus for both the general public and the elite.'
Aydin described Erdogan's politics as 'anti-European,' claiming that Erdogan stopped thinking about the EU as soon as he realized that EU accession is not conducive to sharpening his political profile at home.
Nevertheless, it is still too early to talk about an end to Turkey's European dream, said Aydin. 'Turkey is currently going through a period of great uncertainty due to its political problems,' she explained. 'The attention being given to foreign policy is very low. This means relations with the EU partly depend on domestic political developments in Turkey.'
As long as the official negotiations continue, 'the view to EU membership remains,' she concluded.