Monday, 17 March 2014

Mark Zuckerberg: US government surveillance is a threat to the internet

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg in 2013.
Zuckerberg said: ‘The US government should be the champion for the internet, not a threat.’ Photograph: Jonathan Ernst/Reuters
The billionaire CEO of Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg, criticised US government surveillance in a Facebook post on Thursday, saying it was a “threat” to the internet – and revealed he had called Barack Obama personally to air his concerns.
Zuckerberg made his remarks a day after the The Intercept website reported that the NSA has been using automated systems to spread malware over the internet, sometimes using “fake” Facebook servers.
“The US government should be the champion for the internet, not a threat,” Zuckerberg said in a Facebook post on Thursday. “They need to be much more transparent about what they’re doing, or otherwise people will believe the worst.”
In the post, Zuckerberg said he had called Obama to express his “frustration over the damage the government is creating for all of our future” and said he was confused by the government’s actions.
“The internet works because most people and companies do the same. We work together to create this secure environment and make our shared space even better for the world,” he wrote.
He went on: “This is why I’ve been so confused and frustrated by the repeated reports of the behavior of the US government. When our engineers work tirelessly to improve security, we imagine we’re protecting you against criminals, not our own government.”
Though Zuckerberg has been openly critical of government surveillance,the post had a surprisingly strong tone considering Facebook has longbeen criticized for its privacy policies.
However, Zuckerberg is part of a long list of tech giants who have condemned the extensive government surveillance programs made public by Edward Snowden in the summer of 2013.
Companies including Google, Microsoft and Yahoo demanded sweeping changes to surveillance techniques in December.
Recent revelations about government surveillance activities have shaken the trust of our users, and it is time for the United States government to act to restore the confidence of citizens around the world,” Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer said in the December announcement.

Code Club opens up its coding-for-kids projects for UK parents and teachers

Code Club wants to make its programming materials available to more children around the UK.
Code Club wants to make its programming materials available to more children around the UK.
British after-school programming clubs network Code Club has started publishing its materials online, in an effort to make its coding lessons available to a wider range of children.
The organisation, whose network includes more than 2,100 volunteer-run clubs around the UK, has made its Scratch, web development and Python projects available online for the first time.
“We’ve done this to help more kids learn and create on a computer. Not everyone is lucky enough to have a Code Club yet, but many children do have access to a computer at home or in the classroom,” explained Code Club on its blog.
“The projects are aimed at 9 to 11 year olds, but there is no reason why younger children and grown ups can’t learn too.”
The projects, which are also available for people outside the UK, were developed over the last year by Code Club and its volunteers. “We’re hoping that now the projects are open for all, it will be more tempting to start new Code Clubs,” explained the blog post.
The news follows Code Club’s recent announcement of a training programme to teach computing skills to British primary school teachers, backed by £120,000 of funding from Google.
Its Code Club Pro initiative is launching ahead of the introduction of a revamped primary curriculum in September, which will include computer programming for the first time.
“The computational thinking strand of the new curriculum is the bit some teachers are less happy about: they don’t know it, and were never taught it,” co-founder Clare Sutcliffe told The Guardian at the time.
“That’s fair enough. If you were told suddenly that you had to teach somebody sailing, and had never sailed before, you’d be pretty scared too. But we think we’re in a good place to help those teachers out.”
Growing interest in early programming skills from parents and teachers is also behind the release of a number of tablet apps teaching coding to kids. The latest, Tynker, launched this week, joining Hopscotch, Hakitzu Elite, Kodable and others on the app stores.

Bill Gates: Microsoft would have bought WhatsApp too

Bill Gates WhatsApp comments
Bill Gates said Microsoft was interested in purchasing WhatsApp before Facebook paid $19bn for the company. Photograph: Mehdi Taamallah/AFP/Getty Images
Microsoft’s founder, Bill Gates, says that Facebook and Google weren’t the only companies interested in acquiring WhatsApp: Microsoft was also “willing” to buy the messaging app.
Facebook bought the five-year-old WhatsApp cross-platform text message replacement app, which sends messages via phones’ data connections rather than SMS, for $19bn in February. WhatsApp is Facebook’s biggest acquisition and showed the importance of the drive to mobile from the desktop for the social network.
WhatsApp rebuffed a $1bn offer from Google in April last year prior to the social network’s bid. Facebook’s founder Mark Zuckerberg said that WhatsApp was on track to connect 1 billion people which is what made it valuable.
“Microsoft would have been willing to buy it, too. I don’t know for $19bn, but the company’s extremely valuable,” Gates, 58, told Rolling Stone in a wide-ranging interview covering technology, climate change and God.

‘User bases are extremely valuable’

“I think [Zuckerberg’s] aggressiveness is wise – although the price is higher than I would have expected. It shows that user bases are extremely valuable,” said Gates.
Gates, who co-founded Microsoft in 1975, explained that the community and user base is the most valuable aspect and that it might start with messaging, but the company can then expand the service to sharing photos, documents and games.
WhatsApp founder and chief executive, Jan Koum, announced at Mobile World Congress in Barcelona that the company would be adding voice messaging in the second quarter of the year.
Gates praised Zuckerberg’s drive, but described him as “more of a product manager”, insisting that he was more of a coder starting with architecture where Zuckerberg “starts with products, and Steve Jobs started with aesthetics.”

A 'Babelfish' could be the web's next big thing, says AI expert

The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: Ford Prefect and Arthur Dent in the BBC's adaptation
Ford Prefect and Arthur Dent (played by David Dixon and Simon Jones) in the BBC's adaptation of The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, by Douglas Adams. Photograph: BBC
Though the idea of the “Babelfish” - a thing able to translate between any two languages on the fly - was created by the author Douglas Adams as a handy solution to the question of how intergalactic travellers could understand each other, it could be reality within 25 years. At least, that is, for human language.
Prof Nigel Shadbolt, a close associate of the web inventor Sir Tim Berners-Lee, says that the idea of automatic machine translation “on the fly” is achievable before the world wide web turns 50.
Shadbolt also forecasts that future changes to the web will mean people will be “connected all the time” to medical diagnostic systems – but also that search companies including Google and China’s Baidu may face challenges as web use shifts from the desktop to handheld and mobile devices.
Having first used the web in 1993, via an early version of the Mosaic browser while on a visit to Canada, Shadbolt now thinks that it opens up huge possibilities for artificial intelligence systems built by connecting computers across the web - so-called cloud computing - that will be able to enhance daily life.
“I think we’ll have a sort of Web 3.0 and smarter systems,” he told the Guardian. “With more cloud computing you can imagine that there will be more machine translation.”
The growth of the web and the addition of artificial intelligence systems has already led to automatic translation such as Google’s and Microsoft’s text translation services. But Shadbolt foresees the exponentially growing number of computers connecting to the web providing far greater power.
“A ‘Babelfish’ system will be closing in on reality because of the large-scale resources that will be available to do entire voice translation on the fly,” Shadbolt said. “I would be surprised if in 25 years we haven’t got enhanced Bluetooth-based translators that you can just put in your ear.”
Machine translation and transcription presently struggles with real-time speech. IBM’s Watson system, which won an episode of the quiz game Jeopardy! against the two best human players of the game, had its questions delivered by text (at the same time as the human contestants heard the questions read out). So far no machine has demonstrated an ability to carry out real-time transcription of conversations, though the growing power of cloud computing - and computers generally, which roughly doubles every 18 months - could bring that within reach in just a few years.
Update: Microsoft demonstrated a system in 2012 which can do almost real-time translation between English and Chinese with a lower error rate than before: “rather than having one word in 4 or 5 incorrect, now the error rate is one word in 7 or 8,” noted Rick Rashid, Microsoft’s chief research officer, in a blogpost at the time.
Separately, the OECD calculates that by the time the web turns 50 it could be linking 50bn connected devices worldwide, and that within 10 years people might have as many as 50 internet-connected devices at home.
Shadbolt thinks that “lifelogging”, collecting details about what one sees and hears automatically through an internet-connected system, “will be a big future of the web - people will put more and more of their life on the web - and technology and businesses will be around that will monetise that.”
The growing spread of the mobile web and of web-connected devices which generate their own information and link to each other though will require shifts. “Google uses links between web pages to build its search index,” he explains. That index means that a search for a phrase will rank a series of web pages based on the perceived “authority” of pages containing that phrase, and of those pages which link to them.
“But it gets problematic if people or machines make links that just don’t make sense in the normal way,” Shadbolt says. “Maybe there will be other kinds of search as the ‘machine web’ comes along.”
IBM’s Watson proves that you can get “quite deep integration” with the wealth of information that’s online to answer a broad range of questions effectively, he notes.
“I foresee a world in which there will be augmented intelligence, where we are made smarter by our connection to the web.” He notes that there will be downsides - “cyberterror and cybercrime” - in which there will be an “arms race around security”.

Food Tube: a pukka recipe for the future of culinary content?

Jamie Oliver
Jamie Oliver knows his onions … now his focus is on digital exposure for his recipes. Photograph: Rex Features
"If you don't want my gear [on TV], I've got plenty of other places to take it," Jamie Oliver told advertisers last autumn, brazenly and a tad cheekily, at a Channel 4 "upfront" preview presentation of its 2014 schedule.
No idle threat, either – Oliver's 14-month-old Food Tube channel on YouTube has more than 710,000 subscribers and will be joined at the end of March by another online video venture, Drinks Tube.
Food Tube is still only a small part of the chef and entrepreneur's TV shows to cookbooks and restaurants business, which has annual revenues of more than £150m, but is described by one of Oliver's executives as "probably our biggest future play".
Always an early and enthusiastic digital adopter – his website jamieoliver.com launched in 2001 and averages 8 million users a month – it is perhaps no surprise that Oliver has cottoned on to YouTube's potential as an online video distribution platform.
Jamie Oliver's Food Tube has had some 41m video views since it launched in January of 2013. While it is largely about Oliver cooking with his mates, Food Tube also acts as an umbrella brand for more than a dozen other cooks ranging from newcomers such as DJ BBQ, Food Busker, French Guy Cooking, Cupcake Jemma and the newest addition,Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall.
The home page is crammed with short videos of Oliver cooking in front of noisy crowds, making advertiser-supported recipes like tasty Cajun rice and turkey burrito with Uncle Ben's rice as a sponsor, and barbecuing cheeseburgers named after cricketer Ian Botham.
"Jamie loves the freedom of Food Tube, and suddenly a diary that was impossible to get any time from, offered time – sort of like finding a fourth dimension," says Roy Ackerman, managing director at Oliver's TV production company Fresh One.
More cooks or new cooking videos are added three times a week. The director of food for the Jamie Oliver Group, Zoe Collins, says that the planned business model for Food Tube goes beyond simply creating a food-focused, multichannel network online that has millions of online subscribers. She also wants all the Food Tube cooks to become their own brands that work both on- and offline, selling products from cookery books to pots and pans, and hosting live events. The first of three Food Tube-branded books will be published in June featuring three of the cooks including Kerryann Dunlop, one of the original apprentices at Oliver's 15 restaurant.
Drinks Tube is still very much a work in progress, but will initially be divided into three broad areas: cocktails, beer and wine. "We are aware of a lot of great talent for whom this could be a natural home, and there isn't much out there serving that community at the moment," says Collins.
Drinks Tube – like Food Tube – offers an opportunity for new talent, cookery genres and formats, but where the profits will come from is still unclear. "Jamie is much more about the momentum of being imaginative and unconventional, rather than going straight for the commercial opportunity," says Ajaz Ahmed, chief executive of AKQA, a WPP-owned digital agency that works with the chef's company.
One area where profits are potentially more obvious is commercials production. Oliver launched new company Fat Lemon in January and it has made its first commercial for EE featuring Oliver with Kevin Bacon, the Hollywood actor who is in the mobile operator's 4G campaign, attempting to make the perfect bacon sarnie. The ad deliberately looks a lot like a Food Tube video and has had more than 3m views.
Competition in the online food and drinks space is heating up: last monthdigital media company Vice Media announced a partnership with The X Factor producer FremantleMedia to create food programming content for both online and TV. There is also the problem of translating the Jamie Oliver "halo" to other, lesser-known cooks on the Food Tube network. The bulk of Food Tube's video views are still of content featuring Oliver himself.
There is potentially more creative freedom in making a cookery programme without first having to secure a TV commission. However, despite his provocative comment at Channel 4's upfront presentation, Oliver does not sound as if he is about to abandon TV. "If TV and digital work together then I think they both become a more complete experience," he says. "Digital obviously has a global reach which gives it a different perspective and we have to consider that when building a dynamic global audience."
Ackerman sees great potential in Food Tube for traditional TV schedules because it is entirely original content and a testing ground that is "low-risk and global" for new talent. "It's not impossible to imagine a Food Tube TV channel," says Ackerman, adding that "serious conversations" are already underway with broadcasters in the UK and abroad about the new cooking talent it has unearthed – reportedly including Channel 4.
"Food Tube itself isn't going to make us a lot of money in the very short term," he admits. "But it is probably our biggest future play and, together with digital in general, is the biggest future-proofing for the group.

MtGox knowingly traded non-existent bitcoins for two weeks, filing shows

Did MtGox knowingly trade non-existent bitcoin?
Did MtGox knowingly trade non-existent bitcoin? Photograph: EDGAR SU/REUTERS
MtGox continued trading for at least two weeks despite knowing that it did not hold enough bitcoins to return every customer their money, according to a deposition from the CEO of the embattled bitcoin exchange.
Mark Karpeles, MtGox’s chief executive, gave the deposition to the Northern District of Texas bankruptcy court on Monday 9 March. In it, he explains: “On February 7, 2014, all bitcoin withdrawals were halted by MtGox due to the theft or disappearance of hundreds of thousands of bitcoins owned by MtGox customers as well as MtGox itself.”
It was known before Karpeles’ deposition that MtGox had blamed bitcoin losses due to hacking for the closure of bitcoin withdrawals. But the document shows that it was another two weeks before MtGox halted trading on the exchange itself, when it closed the site without warning on February 25.
In that period, MtGox continued to accept trades and earn commission on them. Users couldn’t cash out their bitcoins, but they could still sell them on the site and attempt to withdraw their money. As a result, the price of bitcoins on the site plummeted over the fortnight, potentially lessening Gox’s liabilities while earning the failing company commission fees.
Jeremy Kirk, of trade publication Computerworld, estimates that those commissions were worth almost $1m over the 19 days the company was trading while knowingly lacking a complete reserve.
While MtGox has pointed to hacking as the reason for its massive loss of bitcoin, the company is quiet as to the reason for a corresponding difference of $27m between stated customer deposits of cash and the amount it was holding.
The latest news of MtGox’s troubles comes against the disappearance of yet another bitcoin exchange. Bitcurex, a polish bitcoin exchange, was apparently hacked on Friday morning. Both the Zloty and Euroexchanges are now offline, and users report seeing the prices of bitcoin shoot up shortly beforehand, suggesting that the site’s coins were removed.

Microsoft's $2.5bn question: what if it doesn't release Office for the iPad?

Growing numbers of people and businesses are choosing to buy tablets such as the iPad - which poses a problem for Microsoft Office,
Growing numbers of people and businesses are choosing to buy tablets such as the iPad - which poses a problem for Microsoft Office. Photograph: Anthony Upton/REX
It may be one of Microsoft’s biggest squandered opportunities.
Tired of waiting for Office to be optimised for their mobile gadgets, a growing contingent of younger companies is turning to cheaper, simpler and touch-friendly apps that can perform word processing and other tasks in the “cloud” - on internet-based systems.
Take Artivest Holdings, a New York-based financial services startup that sells alternative investment products. The New York-based company uses an app called Quip, which combines word processing and messaging, to handle all but the most sensitive legal and financial files.
“There are no more Microsoft Word documents being circulated. If someone emails me a Word document, I’ll tell them to put it in Quip,” said Artivest’s chief investment officer David Levine. 
“If I’m walking to and from home, or going to an appointment, I can review or edit on my iPad. Not being tied to my desk, that’s a big pro,” he said. 
The speed with which apps like Quip have been adopted is forcing Microsoft to intensify its efforts to bring the powerful but ageing Office software suite to tablets and smartphones, according to people close to the company.
Microsoft already has a full iPhone and iPad version of Office ready for release, the sources said. The only question is when chief executive Satya Nadella, who took over in February, will pull the trigger. 

More customers, more money

Nadella wants to widen Office’s customer base but has to balance that with the flagship Windows franchise, which benefits greatly from tight integration with Office, especially on desktop computers. 
“We have some pretty exciting plans,” John Case, the top Office marketing executive, told Reuters without giving any details. “Certainly, interest in Office on the iPad is extreme. When they (customers) want to do real work, they are going to want to use Office.” 
Investors for years have urged Microsoft to adapt Office, its most profitable product, for mobile devices from Apple and Google - rather than shackling it to Windows as PC sales decline
Activist investment firm ValueAct Capital, whose president Mason Morfit sits on Microsoft’s board, has more recently voiced misgivings about Office’s continued mobile absence, sources familiar with the firm said. 
Office still generates huge revenues for Microsoft. In the year to September 2013 the Office division generated $25bn of revenues and made $16.4bn of profit.
However according to one analyst estimate, Microsoft is giving up $2.5bn a year in revenue by keeping Office off the iPad, which has now sold almost 200m units. 
“Office is being disenfranchised on the hottest growth platforms,” Nomura analyst Rick Sherlund wrote in a note to clients. “Maybe it is time to focus on Office independent of Windows.”
Some analysts say it may be too late for Microsoft to win back the iPad generation, even if it introduces a mobile-optimized Office suite in the next few months, as expected. 
“Look at the applications that are on the rise to support mobile. It is not Microsoft OneNote or Word. It’s [file transfer app] Dropbox, or [note taking service] Evernote,” said Ted Schadler, an analyst at tech research firm Forrester. “It’s really about being everywhere. That’s an important, immediate decision that Satya’s going to have to drive.” 

New apps on the block

Microsoft’s productivity tools remain the industry standard, with more than a billion users. But Office revenues are driven primarily by corporate officers who buy for large workforces - and more than half of America’s employees use a mobile device daily to supplement their work.
The rapid rise of apps such as Quip, presentation software Haiku Deckand Prezi, sketch system Paper, project management systemSmartsheet, Good and Evernote, not to mention Google Apps, is nibbling away at the Office franchise. That is particularly true among mid-sized and smaller companies, which tend to be more frugal and less dependent on legacy Office documents or spreadsheets. 
Ian Ray, a network administrator at Cypress Grove Chevre Inc, a cheese maker based in Arcata, California, has most of his 35-member workforce using web-friendly apps on iPads and Google Chromebooks. 
“We use Google for email, Google Docs tied to that, Expensify for expense reports, Lucidchart for doing flow charts, and Smartsheet for organizing projects,” Ray said. 
After more than two decades, Microsoft has in recent years eased some Office functions into the mobile arena, mostly accessibly via web browser. The company has yet to release a touchscreen-optimized version of the full Office suite including Word, PowerPoint and Excel - not even for its own Windows 8 operating system, released in October 2012.
One reason for the delay appears to be internal politics. The powerful Windows group and the younger but more profitable Office group have a patchy history of collaboration. 
When then-Windows boss Steven Sinofsky unveiled the touch-friendly Windows 8 and the Surface tablet in late 2012, many industry insiders remarked on the absence of a tailor-made Office suite, which was shepherded by Kurt DelBene at the time. 
Both Sinofsky and DelBene left their jobs within months. Former Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer has vowed to override divisions with his ‘One Microsoft’ overhaul launched last summer, now in Nadella’s hands. 
But divisions remain. Some in the Windows camp want to make sure Office remains primarily a Windows experience, which should help sales of the Surface. Others in the Office camp, however, want to reach customers on as many platforms as possible. 
“We will bring these apps to Windows devices and also other devices like the iPad in ways that meet our customers’ needs and in ways that make sense economically for Microsoft,” the company said in a recent statement. 

Staff devices and the ticking clock

According to research firm Ovum, 57% of all employees use a personal smartphone or tablet to access corporate data, while 70% of tablet owners use their personal tablets at work at some point.
Companies are increasingly allowing employees to work on their personal devices - a trend the IT industry has dubbed “bring your own device” or BYOD. 
That is the true danger for Microsoft, said Adam Tratt, a former Office executive who is now chief executive of Seattle-based Haiku Deck, an iPad-based presentation app. 
“Microsoft rose to dominance in an age when the CIO (chief information officer) really held the keys to IT decision making,” said Tratt. “Over the past five years, BYOD has really eroded the level of control that many CIOs have.” 
Although they are not as fully fleshed out as Office, younger challengers have been built from the ground up in an era defined by mobile devices and cloud computing. 
Text files in Quip, for instance, are not formatted in virtual 8.5x11in pieces of paper - instead, they automatically zoom to fit any tablet screen. Revisions in a file can be made and viewed, in real time, by collaborators without sending email attachments back and forth. 
“We don’t have Word’s 30 years of features built into it,” said Bret Taylor, Quip’s co-founder. “But we’re much better at collaboration and much better at mobile