Thursday, 20 February 2014

Shahzaib Bajwa: Visa issue resolved, says brother

Muhammad Shahzaib Bajwa, 20, was spending a semester in an exchange programme at the University of Wisconsin-Superior. PHOTO: SUPPORT FOR SHAHZAIB BAJWA FACEBOOK PAGE
WASHINGTON: The visa issue of Pakistani exchange student Muhammad Shahzaib Bajwa has been resolved, according to his brother, Express News reported on Thursday.
His brother, Shahraiz Bajwa, also said that the insurance company will pay the medical bills and Shahzaib will be treated in the US.
Shahraiz stated that Shahzaib’s health has improved and he is showing signs of recovery.
Shahzaib, 20, was spending a semester in an exchange programme at the University of Wisconsin-Superior, studying anthropology and sociology.
On November 13, 2013, he and his friends were driving back to the university from Minneapolis when their car struck a deer, his brother Shahraiz had said.
What was meant to be an academic semester abroad through a State Department-backed exchange programme has turned into a complex journey through US insurance, medical and visa regulations for the family from Faisalabad.
The brother had earlier said that the insurance company was pressing the family to sign off on returning Shahzaib to Pakistan once his visa runs out at the end of the month, threatening not to pay evacuation costs if the family refuses.
“My mother is not going to sign because that would be like killing her son with her own hand,” the brother had stated.

Who was the richest man in all of history?

Who was the richest man ever? (Chart by Branko Milanovic)
Who was the richest man ever? (Chart by Branko Milanovic)
It's fairly easy to figure out who the wealthiest person in the United States is. Just look at the Forbes 100, and you see it's Bill Gates, worth $67 billion. Carlos Slim, the Mexican titan, is worth $73 billion, a measly nine percent more. And with a bit of Googling, you could find similar answers for people across history. The famous Roman politician Marcus Crassus was thought to be among the republic's wealthiest, with a net worth of 200 million sesterces. Fast forward through time, and John D. Rockefeller is said to have had a peak of $1.4 billion in 1937.
Comparing these fortunes across time and geography poses plentiful problems, though. It's obviously a big challenge to convert sesterces to dollars. But it's also difficult to compare Rockefeller's wealth with Gates' and Gates' with Slim's. The essential question is not how much money you have, but what can you buy with it, where you live and when you live. Slim can buy a lot more in his home of Mexico than Gates can in the United States. Not an easy thing to compare.
Branko Milanovic, a top inequality economist, has come up with a smart idea to make sense of this conundrum in his new book, "The Haves and the Have-Nots: A Brief and Idiosyncratic History of Global Inequality." He writes:
We do not have an exchange rate that would convert Roman sesterces or asses or Castellan seventeenth-century pesos into dollars of equal purchasing power today. Even more, what 'equal purchasing power' might mean in that case is far from clear. 'Equal purchasing power' should mean that one is able to buy with X Roman sesterces the same bundle of goods and services as with Y U.S. dollars today. But not only have the bundles changed (no DVDs in Roman times), but were we to constrain the bundle to cover only the goods that existed both then and now, we would soon find that the relative prices have changed substantially. Services then were relatively cheap (because wages were low); nowadays, services in rich countries are expensive. The reverse would be true for bread or olive oil.
Thus, to compare the wealth and income of the richissime in several historical periods, the most reasonable approach is to situate them in their historical context and measure their economic power in terms of their ability to purchase human labor (of average skill) at that time and place.
So for Crassus, Milanovic estimates that given his wealth of 200 million sesterces, his annual income, at a 6 percent interest rate, was 12 million sesterces. The average annual income of a Roman at the time was roughly 380 sesterces, so Crassus' income equaled 32,000 Romans.
In Rockefeller's case, his assets of $1.4 billion, assuming the same rate of return, would yield an income equal to 116,000 Americans in 1937. And in Gates' case, his wealth (in 2005) was $50 billion, or $3 billion annually, which when divided by 2005 gross domestic product per capita of $40,000 yields 75,000 workers.
Milanovic concludes that Slim is, by this definition, the richest of all.
"His wealth, also according to Forbes magazine, prior to the global financial crisis in 2009, was estimated at more than $53 billion. Using the same calculation as before, we find that Slim could command ...some 440,000 Mexicans. So he appears to have been, locally, the richest of all! No stadium in Mexico, not even the famous Azteca, would come close to accommodating all the compatriots Mr. Slim could hire with his annual income."

Google Fiber bulks up with plans for 9 more regions

Google reveals plans to expand its gigabit Internet network to nine more urban areas, covering 34 cities
Google plans to expand its Fiber gigabit Internet network to 34 cities in nine regions across the United States.
(Credit: Google)
Google Fiber could be coming to your hometown, a move that feels a bit like playing in the bandwidth lottery, as the company announced Wednesday nine more locales that are being considered for its gigabit Internet network.

Heather Burnett Gold, the president of Fiber to the Home Council of North America, said that the announcement indicates that the United States is at a tipping point toward greater gigabit network adoption.The nine regions cover 34 cities and include San Jose, Calif.; Portland, Ore.; Salt Lake City; Phoenix; Atlanta; Nashville, Tenn.; San Antonio, Texas; Charlotte, N.C.; and Raleigh-Durham, N.C.
"We're starting to see gigabit envy," she said, as more cities become interested in the benefits of gigabit networks. "Google's going to work with all these communities simultaneously, building a compendium of best practices."
Speaking with CNET from a Fiber to the Home conference in Stockholm, she said that analysts there think that the US will have gigabit speeds available to 14 percent to 20 percent of its citizens by 2019.

Google Fiber coming soon to these cities (pictures)

1-2 of 9
Scroll LeftScroll Right
Even if a city or town opts to not contract with Google Fiber, Gold said, "we'll have a real road map for communities" on how they can prepare for gigabit Internet.
Milo Medin, vice president of Google Access Services, wrote in the blog post announcing the expansion that Google is working with each region to evaluate both environmental factors such as topography and housing density, and regional readiness, such as providing Google with utility plans so it can determine how best to wire each region. He said Google plans to offer updates by the end of the year on which cities will be getting Google Fiber.
Medin also cautioned that although not all of its proposals will be approved, cities that gather the information that Google needs to build Fiber will be better ready for any gigabit network provider.
"This is the direction we need to go in," Gold said. "Everybody's finally getting the message

BAE Systems could be in for a bumpy ride as it reports full-year results

BAE Systems
BAE disappointed investors when it revealed a £6bn deal to sell fighter jets to the UAE had fallen through. Photograph: Danny Lawson/PA Archive/Press Association Images
Investors will be wary of reverberations from last week's profits warning from Rolls-Royce when fellow defence contractor BAE Systems reports full-year results on Thursday.
BAE's shares were dragged down in Rolls-Royce's wake last Thursday when £3bn was wiped off the engine maker's market value following the announcement. Rolls-Royce shocked the market when it largely blamed US and UK defence cuts for an end to 10 years of unbroken growth this year.
An industry analyst at broker Charles Stanley, Tina Cook, said: "After Rolls-Royce, people will be watching what defence suppliers say very closely."
Rolls-Royce, which makes most of its money from civil aviation, had failed to alert investors to the coming slowdown at its defence division. By contrast, BAE, which relies far more on defence sales, has prepared shareholders for the impact of spending cuts in the US where it makes 40% of revenues.
The other question for BAE is whether it has successfully renegotiated a long-standing deal with Saudi Arabia. The company warned in October that if agreement was not reached by results day it would knock 6p or 7p off 2013 earnings per share.
Cook said: "It's been clear in the case of BAE Systems that they would come under pressure from US and UK defence cuts because they are their important markets, but in light of what has happened at Rolls-Royce's defence division people will still want to hear about that.
"The big focus for BAE Systems is going to be about the Saudi renegotiation. The market has not heard definitively either way since their disclosure in October."
Analysts expect earnings to rise 9.5% to 42.6p a share if the Saudi renegotiation is included in 2013 numbers. Otherwise, annual earnings are set to fall.
BAE disappointed investors in December when it revealed that a £6bn deal to sell fighter jets to the United Arab Emirates had fallen through. The same day it announced that talks to renegotiate the 2007 deal with Saudi Arabia would drag on into this calendar year.

Sir Nick Carter appointed as chief of army

Major-General Nick Carter
In his new role, Nick Carter will have to embark on a campaign to persuade the public as well as the government about the army’s value. Photograph: Manpreet Romana/AFP/Getty Images
General Sir Nick Carter has been appointed as the new head of theBritish army, taking over in September as chief of the general staff from General Sir Peter Wall.
Carter faces a series of tough challenges, ranging from reduced militaryspending to problems with recruitment.
A former commander of British forces in Afghanistan, he will have to embark on a campaign to convince the public as well as the government of the army's value.
The Ministry of Defence has been vulnerable to budget cutbacks that have seen the army reduced from more than 100,000 to 82,500 troops.
These regular troops are to be buttressed by an estimated 30,000 reservists, but the army is struggling to persuade potential recruits and their employers to give up the time needed for training. Another issue is that many potential recruits are being rejected because of a rise in obesity.
Carter is expected to campaign for spending on the armed forces to be pegged – given a fixed share of GDP in a similar way to the international aid department's budget.
The danger he faces is that the next government, looking for more budget cuts, will target the military.
Carter, at present commander of land forces, was responsible for drawing up the army's current restructuring plans after the government's 2010 strategic defence review.
During his last tour in Afghanistan he was deputy commander of the international coalition force Isaf. As well as three tours of duty in Afghanistan, he has served in Iraq, Bosnia, Kosovo, Northern Ireland, Cyprus and Germany.
The defence secretary, Philip Hammond, said: "I look forward to working with Sir Nicholas as we deliver our programme of reforms to create a leaner, more efficient Ministry of Defence and more agile, adaptable armed forces

UK and Iran agree to re-establish direct diplomatic relations

The Iranian flag hangs outside the Iranian embassy
The Iranian flag hangs outside the Iranian embassy in London after diplomatic relations were restored with the UK. Photograph: Carl Court/AFP/Getty Images
The green, white, red tricolour flag of the Islamic republic rose over Iran's embassy in London on Thursday as the UK and Tehran restored direct diplomatic contacts through non-resident chargĂ© d'affaires rather than via third-country intermediaries.
As Iran and six world powers including Britain agreed on a framework for further nuclear talks in Vienna, the foreign office announced that Sweden will cease to represent the UK interest section in Iran because London and Tehran were re-establishing direct diplomatic ties.
"The UK has agreed with Iran that from today bilateral relations will be conducted directly through non-resident Charges d'Affaires and officials," said a foreign office spokesperson. "We will no longer have formal Protecting Power arrangements in place. This is the next stage of the step-by-step process of taking forward our bilateral relationship with Iran."
Under the power arrangements, Oman was hosting Iran's interest section in London, while Sweden acted for the UK in Tehran. "We will no longer have Protecting Powers acting as intermediaries. Diplomatic contact will now be made direct between our two countries. Sweden will cease to be the UK's Protecting Power on 20 February 2014. Oman will cease to be Iran's Protecting Power in the UK," the spokesperson said.
Despite this, British and Iranian embassies in their respective capitals remain closed until capitals decide to upgrade to a full diplomatic status. The spokesperson said: "We have not taken any decision on reopening the British Embassy in Tehran. This will depend on the progress we make in our step-by-step approach. Our Embassy in Tehran remains closed, but a small number of our local staff are continuing to work on our compounds carrying out administrative and maintenance work."
Iran-UK diplomatic relations has been downgraded since November 2011 when the British embassy in Tehran was stormed by a mob which triggered one of the worst crises in the bilateral ties since the 1979 Islamic revolution.
Since Hassan Rouhani took office as Iran's new president, Britain and Iran have upgraded ties and taken significant steps towards reopening their missions. David Cameron and Rouhani also spoke on the phone in November in the first direct contact between a British prime minister and an Iranian president in a decade.
Last month, the former foreign secretary, Jack Straw, led a four-member parliamentary delation visiting Tehran in an attempt to improve London-Tehran ties. The visit came a month after Britain's newly appointed chargĂ© d'affaires, Ajay Sharma, travelled to Iran in a first diplomatic visit by a UK envoy since London withdrew all staff from Tehran after the storming of its embassy. Sharma's Iranian counterpart is Mohammad-Hassan Habibollahzadeh.
On Thursday, the flag of the Islamic republic of Iran rose over the Iranian embassy in London as the mission is giving a limited consular service. The embassy is not yet officially reopened and permanent Iranian national staff are not yet stationed in London. The Swedish flag and a Swedish embassy British interests section' plaque was due to be removed from the two British Embassy compounds in Tehran. A British embassy plaque will instead go up soon, plus an 'Embassy Closed' sign.
In the absence of embassies, around 400,000 Iranian nationals living in the UK, and less than 100 UK nationals residing in Iran are facing difficulties with consular services, such as passport renewal or consular access.
On a separate issue meanwhile, Iran, which is one of the world's worst enemies of the press according to CPJ, on Thursday shut down yet another reformist newspaper, Aseman, which only succeeded to print six issues in its short lifetime.

Threats to energy companies risk 'the lights going out', warns Centrica chief

gas flame
British Gas admitted it had lost 462,000 customers since January 2012. Photograph: David Gould/Getty Images
Centrica, the owner of British Gas, has warned that the intense political debate over gas and electricity prices has put Britain at risk of blackouts as soon as next year.
Rick Haythornthwaite, Centrica's new chairman, said threats to impose price caps or break up Britain's biggest energy supplier was raising the real possibility of "the lights going out in Britain".
He said: "I think the reputation of Britain as a place in which to invest is under threat and the time to correct that is now, not after the 2015 election, by which time the possibility of the lights going out in Britain will be looming much larger. I don't see this as the figment of a scaremonger's imagination. I think right now we've got to restart collaborative, constructive dialogue around these key issues; we cannot afford to wait, hostilities have got to cease."
Experts have warned that the gap between energy supply and demand is close to crisis levels as the UK has not been quick enough to build new power stations as old coal plants are closed down. Sir John Armitt, who is also advising Labour on Britain's infrastructure, has warned that the country's energy capacity surplus is down to 4%. Regulators used to recommend a 25% capacity surplus.
Sam Laidlaw, Centrica's chief executive, told the BBC: "No new power stations are being sanctioned at the moment because everybody is worried about the political situation."
In an eye-catching pledge at the Labour conference last year, Ed Miliband pledged to freeze energy prices for 20 months if he wins the 2015 election, while energy secretary Ed Davey has suggested that Centrica should be broken up.
Nick Luff, finance director at Centrica, said consumers would be forced to "shift their demand" for energy in the future by only using washing machines at night, for example if the situation were not resolved. He said factories may also be forced not to operate at peak times.
"The risk is on a cold still day in January when the wind turbines are not turning and demand is very high because it is cold," Luff said.
Caroline Flint, the shadow energy secretary, said: "It is not acceptable for companies to threaten that the lights will go out because they don't want greater transparency, competition and accountability. When markets aren't working government has a responsibility to step in. Labour's plans to reset the energy market will follow the price freeze in 2017 and help restore public confidence
"The reality is that what investors care about is long term certainty. ."
Laidlaw said Labour's pledge was not credible. "We firmly believe that any form of price control in a competitive market is not the answer and is not in the best interests of customers, and this has been clearly demonstrated by experience in other markets. Such proposals create both short-term uncertainty for all energy suppliers and longer-term additional costs for customers."
The blackout warning came as British Gas admitted it had lost 462,000 customers since January 2012, including 100,000 in the past seven weeks. The exodus of customers, higher costs and warmer winter weather dragged British Gas's annual profits down 6% to £571m.
The company still made an average profit of £37.60 from its 15.2m customers.
British Gas increased its tariffs by an average of 9.2% in November as part of a round of winter bill rises across the "big six" energy companies. It said the number of customers leaving was "stabilising" after it scaled back its price rise by 3.2%.
A spokesperson for the Department of Energy and Climate Change said: "We are acting to increase competition in the market and are working with Ofgem to make the retail market simpler and clearer for customers.
"Since 2010 the number of small energy suppliers has doubled, providing consumers with a real choice which has resulted in more than 1.5 million people switching in the last quarter alone, many to smaller companies."
Laidlaw said British Gas had "always been one of the first companies to reduce prices when the opportunity arises", but could not make any promises over prices for the year ahead.
Centrica's shares have lost more than a fifth of their value since Miliband's speech in September, with the stock driven down further after Davey called for a full-scale investigation into the energy market that could see British Gas broken up. Laidlaw said the company would find it harder to make big investments and secure big gas deals if it was forced to break up. "If we were broken up into smaller companies, we wouldn't be able to undertake the scale of activity," he said.
Laidlaw, who was paid more than £5m last year, admitted his pay was high but said executives needed to be paid well, especially if they had to cope with political attacks.
"I do believe that people who do a good job ought to be appropriately rewarded, particularly a very important job for the country in terms of bringing gas to Britain, in terms of investing in new sources of gas supply, investing in new power stations," he told Radio 4's Today programme. "These are jobs that are important for society and deserve to be rewarded.
"Like any business, you have to attract the necessary talent and this is a competitive marketplace and clearly, obviously, a lot of the politics doesn't make this more attractive as a place to work, so we need to obviously reward people appropriately."
Laidlaw pledged to give his bonus, which was worth £1.5m last year, to charity this year.