Monday, 3 February 2014

US carrier mergers would face tough time getting DOJ approval

T-Mobile CEO John Legere.
T-Mobile CEO John Legere.
(Credit: Lori Grunin/CNET)
US wireless carriers who have the urge to merge will meet resistance in the form of the Justice Department.
In an interview with The New York Times published Thursday, William Baer, assistant attorney general in the antitrust division, said that any merger proposals on the part of the major US carriers would encounter intense scrutiny. Baer cited "much more favorable competitive conditions" in the mobile landscape since the DOJ filed a lawsuit to block the merger between AT&T and T-Mobile in 2011. AT&T eventually withdrew its offer.
"It's going to be hard for someone to make a persuasive case that reducing four firms to three is actually going to improve competition for the benefit of American consumers," Baer told the Times. "Any proposed transaction would get a very hard look from the antitrust division."
Since 2011, T-Mobile has developed into a more competitive carrier, providing the DOJ with more ammunition against further consolidation in the mobile industry. That ammunition could be used in any attempted merger between Sprint and T-Mobile.
Masayoshi Son, CEO of Sprint parent SoftBank, and Sprint CEO Dan Hesse recently met with the DOJ to get the agency's take on a prospective merger, according to The Wall Street Journal. The two CEOs were reportedly met with skepticism.

Behind Google profits, massive spending on computing gear

Google's capital expenditures, which mostly go toward computing and networking equipment, have risen dramatically over the last year.
Google's capital expenditures, which mostly go toward computing and networking equipment, have risen dramatically over the last year.
(Credit: Stephen Shankland/CNET)
You think it's easy printing money at Google? Think again.
The company on Thursday reported enviable financial results for the fourth quarter of 2013, with revenue of $16.86 billion, up 17 percent, and net income of $3.38 billion. It's just another three months of success for Google's money machine, but to make it work Google has to spend a gargantuan amount on its own infrastructure -- chiefly servers, networking equipment, and the data centers that house them.
Money
In the fourth quarter, Google spent $2.26 billion on that infrastructure -- a few pennies short of its all-time capital-expenditures high of $2.29 billion in the third quarter but more than double what it paid in the year-earlier quarter.
For comparison, General Motors spent $1.9 billion on capital expenditures in the third quarter of 2013.
The computing industry has done well in the last couple decades finding businesses where top-line revenues can drop to bottom-line profits without too many capital expenses getting in the way. Microsoft profited by creating software, an intangible but useful product that, once written, could be sold over and over again. Today, startups rely on Amazon Web Services to avoid big up-front payments on the hardware that provides the services people reach through mobile apps and Web browsers.
But in the big leagues where Google plays, with a broad array of online services available across most of the planet, capex is big and getting bigger.
"We expect to continue to make significant capital expenditures," Google has drily noted in every financial earnings press release for at least the last three years. Boy, is that an understatement.

All that computing gear is what lets Google not only retrieve 765 links for a search on something as obscure as "amblongus pie"within 0.38 seconds but also to predict partway through typing "amblongus" that the second word likely will be "pie." That infrastructure also houses photos on Google+, runs instant auctions to place advertisements next to search results, delivers Android apps through Google Play, and lets people edit documents edited at Google Apps.
Of course, Google has plenty of other expenses -- for example, paying 48,000 employees to maintain the infrastructure, create the next-generation services, fight the patent lawsuits, and vacuum the carpets.
But make no mistake: underpinning all that Google profit is an awful lot of hardware.

Lenovo-Motorola deal likely to win US regulatory approval but...

The Motorola Moto G
The Motorola Moto G
(Credit: Andrew Hoyle/CNET)
Lenovo's purchase of Motorola Mobility should get a green light from US regulators. But the company will have to agree to certain concessions in the name of US national security.
On Wednesday, the Chinese computer maker announced its $2.91 billion purchase of Google's Motorola mobile phone business and around 2,000 related patents. But like any major acquisition, this one has to go through the regulatory ropes before it's a done deal.

Lenovo's $2.3 billion purchase of IBM's Intel server lineup, announced earlier this month, faces the same scrutiny.The purchase faces a review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), a federal agency that looks out for potential US national security issues, Reuters reported Friday. As such, Lenovo will likely be asked to set up certain measures to make sure it can't be influenced by the Chinese government in ways that would harm US security, a security expert told Reuters. The CFIUS may also require that certain products be handled only by US citizens or be located only in the United States.
Despite the need for certain concessions, Lenovo does have a distinct advantage, Reuters noted. It's been through this process before.
The company was up against similar roadblocks when it acquired IBM's PC business in 2005. Lenovo also dealt with the CFIUS in 2012 when it purchased US software maker Stoneware and launched a partnership with EMC. Each of those deals won regulatory approval.
"If there was a Chinese company that was well-positioned to see this deal come off, it's Lenovo," Jim Lewis, a security expert with the think tank Center for Strategic and International Studies, told Reuters. "They've done the dance before and they know what the steps are."

Apple said to be studying solar, motion charging for iWatch

iWatch concept.
iWatch concept.
(Credit: Todd Hamilton)
A New York Times report is providing more fodder for iWatch speculation, including the purported use of solar power.
Apple has been testing both solar and wireless charging for the rumored iWatch, according to astory in Sunday's New York Times.
The wireless charging method would involve magnetic induction, according to the report.
This could conceivably involve the use of acharging plate.
Another method to juice up the watch may be to integrate a solar-charging layer in the screen, according to the report.
Yet another involves "charging the battery through movement, a method that is already used in many modern watches," the Times reported. "A person's arm swinging could operate a tiny charging station that generates and pushes power to the device while walking." Apple filed a patent for the technology in 2009.
The impetus for alternatives to the traditional battery is rooted in the fact that a smart watch powered by a sophisticated processor would run out of juice too soon to entice consumers.
In the story, the Times cited Nest co-founder and "one of the fathers of the iPod" Tony Fadell, saying Apple tried for "many years" to build a smarter battery with, for example, solar charging but failed.
The report also repeated previous rumors of a curved glass display.

Ministry slaps ban on export of precious stones

Pakistan is one of the leading exporters of precious and semi-precious stones – except for diamond – to the world market. PHOTO: FILE
ISLAMABAD: 
The federal government has slapped a ban on export of all kinds of precious and semi-precious stones, says Atif Rashid Khawaja, Chairman Action Committee of the Peshawar-based All Pakistan Commercial Exporters Association, terming it unfair.
“The ban was imposed by the Ministry of Commerce on January 23 through an unfair decision without taking the exporters into confidence,” he told The Express Tribune.
 photo Commerceministryofficial_zpsd0108106.jpg
Though the restriction has blocked shipments of exporters from the entire country, a majority of them are from Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa as Peshawar serves as the hub.
According to Khawaja, over 3,000 exporters have lost their business that they have been running for the last 60 years.
A large quantity of precious stones such as Ruby, Emerald, Sapphire, Lapis, Quartz, Tourmaline, Aquamarine and Peridot has been seized and kept by the Pakistan Customs at the Peshawar airport after the imposition of the ban.
Pakistan is one of the leading exporters of precious and semi-precious stones – except for diamond – to the world market, especially to the United States, Thailand and the entire Europe.
The ban came into force after the government issued an SRO in a bid to discourage smuggling of gold to India.
Khawaja said the government’s move was aimed at restricting the export of gold jewellery, which had nothing to do with the export of precious stones. But, he said, the Trade Development Authority of Pakistan (TDAP) had also applied the SRO to the export of precious stones.
Commerce ministry officials, while rejecting the claims of the association, said the SRO also covered the export of precious stones.
Talking to The Express Tribune, an official of the Ministry of Commerce insisted that they had asked the exporters of precious stones to get themselves registered with the TDAP after depositing Rs30,000 as registration fee.
“Exports will not be allowed without registration, which will be renewable after every three years,” the official declared.
However, the exporters were not willing to accept the condition, believing that the fee would pave the way for the levy of general sales tax (GST) on the export of precious stones, which Khawaja called unlawful.
He said the country had earned millions of dollars annually with the export of precious stones. “Now, the country will lose this foreign exchange due to the curb on export. It will also encourage smuggling of precious stones through Afghanistan,” he added.
Khawaja warned of a strong protest against the ban in a bid to force the ministry to lift all restrictions. “Exporters at a recent meeting in Peshawar have expressed strong resentment and decided to stage a sit-in in front of provincial assemblies and the national parliament,” he said.
Citing the example of India, he said its exporters of precious stones were earning billions of dollars as Delhi had offered them a host of facilities, but in Pakistan the industry was being discouraged which would have a negative impact on its export earnings.

Privatisation tsar embarks on quest to revive economy

Chairman of Pakistan's Privatisation Commission Mohammad Zubair speaks during an interview with Reuters at his office in Islamabad January 29, 2014. PHOTO: REUTERS
ISLAMABAD: Mohammad Zubair was on a cruise dinner with Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif in Thailand when he was offered the hardest job of his life: privatising a huge chunk of the economy while fighting resistance from the opposition and trade unions.
When the prime minister left the table, a colleague of former IBM executive Zubair rushed to his side.
“Are you mad? Three privatisation ministers have gone to jail and most have corruption cases hanging over their heads,” he said. “Don’t take this job.”
But the country’s new privatisation tsar is determined to find buyers for 68 public companies, most of them loss-making, including two gas companies, an oil company, about 10 banks, the national airline and power distribution companies – all within the next two years.
The government sees the sell-offs as a life saver for the $225 billion economy crippled by power shortages, corruption and militant violence. Successful privatisation is Nawaz’s top political and economic goal.
“We lose 500 billion rupees annually because of failing enterprises,” Zubair told Reuters. “Every day a file lands on a bureaucrat’s desk and he has to take a decision he isn’t qualified to. This can’t go on, no matter what.”
Pakistan can raise up to $5 billion in privatisation revenue in the next two years to ease pressure on strained public finance, Zubair said.
Last September, the International Monetary Fund saved the country from a possible default by agreeing to lend it $6.7 billion over three years. In return, Pakistan must make good on a longstanding promise to privatise loss-making state companies.
Privatisation officials, requesting anonymity, said several foreign investors, including the World Bank’s private-sector arm, the International Finance Corporation, and the US mutual fund Fidelity Investments have shown interest in the companies.
But for Zubair, a former IBM chief financial officer for the Middle East and Africa, the real challenge is overcoming resistance from thousands of workers who will have to be laid off and opposition parties who are against the plan.
Once a source of pride, Pakistan International Airlines is struggling to stay aloft, having accumulated losses of more than 250 billion rupees. A quarter of its 40 aircraft are grounded. Flights are regularly cancelled and engineers say they have to cannibalise some planes to keep others flying.
Unions strongly oppose the privatisation. The IMF wants the airline partially privatised by December.
Another asset is Pakistan Steel Mills, which has accumulated losses of more than Rs100 billion. Overstaffed by at least three times, employees haven’t been paid since October.
An attempt to privatise the mill in 2006 was blocked by the then chief justice. Foreign investment dwindled as deals got caught up in court. Now, under a new Supreme Court chief, officials say the prospects of reform have improved.
‘No magic wand’
Under IMF conditions, financial advisers must be hired to evaluate the assets and examine accounts by June.
Zubair’s daily work includes visits to opposition lawmakers, parliamentary committees and unions to convince them of his plan. But he has few takers.
“The answer to our current economic malaise lies not in hawking of state-owned institutions but in restructuring these industries,” Bilawal Bhutto, patron-in-chief of Pakistan People’s Party, wrote in a commentary.
Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf MNA and former chief executive of one of Pakistan’s largest conglomerates Asad Umar said privatisation was being pursued on an unrealistic time frame and the criteria for identifying entities was inconsistent.
For Umar, it makes no sense that on the list with a bleeding airline are Oil and Gas Development Co Ltd and Pakistan Petroleum Ltd, which made profits of 91 billion and 42 billion rupees respectively in 2013, and have zero debt.
Not all sell-offs are expected to go smoothly.
A nine-year dispute between the government and Etisalat, the United Arab Emirates’ largest telecoms firm, over payments from the privatisation of Pakistan Telecommunication Company Ltd, is seen as a discouragement for investors.
But Zubair says no plan is without risk.
“There is no magic wand to ensure that all these ventures will be successful,” he said. “But the bottom line is that I’m not going to hold off privatisation for anyone.”

Apple said to build its own content delivery network

The tech giant currently relies on Akamai and Level 3 to deliver its apps, iTunes content, and software updates to users, but that may change, according to an analyst
Apple's new iTunes Radio feature.
(Credit: CNET)
Apple may soon control even more of the user experience.
The Cupertino, Calif., electronics giant may be building its own content delivery network to deliver apps, software updates, and iTunes content to consumers, according to Dan Rayburn, principal analyst at business consulting firm Frost & Sullivan.

Currently, Akamai Technologies and Level 3 Communications provide that service to Apple, hosting the content for the company. However, Apple may want to take that control under its own roof as it focuses more on its iCloud service. That could result in better service for customers, as well as allow Apple to exert even more control over its products.
Details are pretty limited at this point, but Rayburn said Apple is in the process of building its network. It has hired many people experienced in building out large-scale networks, he said. It's unclear what type of content Apple's network will deliver, what areas it will service, and other factors.
"Right now they control the entire customer experience, except for the way content is delivered to their devices," Rayburn said. "Since Apple does not own the last mile they won't be able to have complete control, but having their own CDN would give them more control and security than they have now."
Apple declined to comment.