Tuesday, 22 October 2013

Mysterious messages on Sugarloaf mountain

Mysterious messages on Sugarloaf mountain
Exclusive images of the bizarre illumination at the iconic landmark in World Cup host city Rio de Janeiro on Sunday, which appears to be connected to football
EXTRA TIME

Residents of Rio de Janeiro were left bemused by the appearance of a series of unidentified signs and circles on the face of Sugarloaf Mountain on Sunday night.
As darkness fell, witnesses reported seeing a green laser beam fired from an unknown location onto the 396m mountainside overseeing the Atlantic Ocean.
The beam gradually enlarged to form scrambled symbols which gave the impression of an encrypted message. "What does it all mean?" asked one stunned bystander. "Why is this happening?"

Mountain mystery | Rio residents were left baffled by the illuminated messages on Sunday

The encoded letters increased in brightness before settling into the shape of a gigantic logo. It resembled a giant circle with a football shape carved into the centre of the image.
Rio is due to stage key matches and the World Cup final next summer but it is not yet clear what connection this unexplained incident has to the sport.
The mysterious hologram remained illuminated on Sugarloaf for more than two hours before finally fading, at which point wording appeared clearly stating: #winnertakesearth.
The unusual scene also prompted passing drivers to reduce their speed and residents to flock to the edge of the oceanic Guanabara Bay. It was not long before the discussion spread to Twitter where grainy photographs were posted.
Maria Clara Rocha, 27, said: "I have lived in Rio all my life and I have never seen anything like it. It was very eerie and spooky. I really want to know what this all means

What's going off in your fridge?

Zoe Williams's mouldy baked beans
Zoe Williams's mouldy baked beans. Photograph: Zoe Williams for the Guardian

Zoe Williams: furry beans

I am not too bad on the obvious rot candidates: meat rarely goes off in my fridge, because I will eat anything, in any condition, whatever it smells like. I have a household hierarchy: the children get the fresh food; food that is past its sell-by date but doesn't yet smell goes to other adults; then I step in for the wilting, the precarious, the mouldy-at-the-edges-but-otherwise-fine … I'm like Dusty Bin. I have a blindspot around cans, however, and have never finished a tin of beans.

Stuart Heritage: stinky chicken

Stuart Heritage's mouldy itemsStuart Heritage's mouldy items. Photograph: Stuart Heritage for the Guardian
I hate waste, to the extent that I'll usually keep stuff until it no longer resembles food (I once found a pepper with a full beard in my fridge, much to the delight of my Instagram followers) but, by chance, the contents of my fridge are largely edible today. The only vaguely disgusting things are a chicken thigh that has been left uncovered for five days, a hard lime, a dodgy banana and something that might have once been a strawberry. The chicken stinks, so I'll throw it out – but I could still get juice out of the lime and eat the banana without much fuss. And the strawberry? I can't rule out the chance of me eating that at some point. Well, everyone loves strawberries, don't they?

Marina O'Loughlin: liquefying cabbage

Marina O'Loughlin's fridgeMarina O'Loughlin's fridge. Photograph: Marina O'Loughlin for the Guardian
Hideous, post-weekend car crash of a fridge, all vodka and experimental Japanese ingredients, trip souvenirs (the Black Forest ham) and a million chilli sauces. The big bowl contains celeriac remoulade, which is going in the bin. And there, lurking on the bottom shelf, are some liquefying carrots and red cabbage designed to get kids to eat vegetables – they'll always eat an Asian-spiced coleslaw – butdestined for the composter in the garden. There's also some chicory, sell-by well past, never liberated from its packaging, that will end up there too. I try not to throw out any food – a legacy from my Italian mother who would freeze single egg whites – but inevitably eyes are bigger than stomachs. Hence the composter, which provided a decent crop of tomatoes this year – some of which are heading back in there as we speak. Which has a certain symmetry, I suppose.

Tim Dowling: rotting apples

I'm not afraid of limp celery or a bendy carrot, but I do have a strong aversion to a past-its-best apple. Thanks to poor rotation, there are always a few gently deliquescing at the bottom of the fruit bowl, threatening to speed up the rot of everything else in there. We have a tortoise who enjoys rotting fruit; unfortunately we have enough rotting fruit to feed nine tortoises. It all gets tossed out periodically, generally when my view of the TV becomes occluded by fruit flies.

Lucy Mangan: ancient haddock

Lucy Mangan's fridgeLucy Mangan's fridge. Photograph: Lucy Mangan for the Guardian
All these plastic boxes are filled with bits of meat, fish, potato and pasta of uncertain age and provenance. Some I remember cooking, some I don't. This is how I have lived ever since I had a child. Before that, meals were either spaghetti bolognese, chicken in a Campbell's Condensed soup or takeaways. It wasn't tasty, nutritious or edifying in any way, but it was efficient. I ate one option til it was gone, then made a batch of the other and did likewise. Then got takeaways until I had time and inclination to begin the cycle again.
Now I have to try to feed the child properly, meals are a bit more varied but my efficiency has gone to cock. You can judge me. I'm too tired to care.
The chicken is three days out of date, but that's well within cookable range here. As I took the picture, I noticed at the back of the fridge some smoked haddock that should have been eaten by 29 June. I deduce that I once had plans for kedgeree. To be honest, I'd still give it a whirl, but my husband insisted on binning it. Probably wise. Christ knows what state the eggs are in. We don't even keep them in the fridge.

Matthew Fort: no waste

I very, very rarely throw anything away. I'm not a food miser, but I can't think of the last thing I chucked out. It's against my religion. I never, ever buy bags of salad. I buy fruit and veg in small quantities. If I see something going off, I cut out the going-off part and eat the rest. I keep old bits of cheese to put into soups. The other day I combined some yoghurt and buttermilk far past their use-by dates, strained them through some muslin and used the resulting novel dairy product on stewed plums, which were also looking a bit tired and emotional. Bloody lovely. The contents of my fridge at the moment are all in perfectly acceptable condition. God's truth.

Hugh Muir: decaying burgers

Hugh Muir's out-of-date burgersHugh Muir's out-of-date burgers. Photograph: Hugh Muir for the Guardian
The problem is not a propensity to waste food, rather a determination not to waste anything. And so there they sit in the freezer: a four-pack ofTesco burgers. Tomato and basil. Slightly greyed, massively unappealing, in their opaque plastic box. They were smuggled in for a teenager's barbecue many months ago, but they weren't nice then and certainly wouldn't be now. So there they sit, decay retarded by ice, but decaying nonetheless. Won't eat 'em, can't bin 'em. Help!

John Crace: soggy cucumber

Today the fridge is at its most virtuous. Monday is dustbin day, so every Sunday night I have a quick rootle round to look for stuff that has gone off. A usual haul throws up some manky bits of lettuce, rotting veg and the odd bit of meat that may or may not have salmonella. Last night's haul was below average. A cucumber that had gone completely soggy and was only held together by its plastic wrapping; it was so rank, I can only assume it had slithered to the back of the salad drawer to escape my attention for several weeks. There was also a heat-up vegetable pot that was bulging dangerously with the build-up of gases. It was tempting to leave it in the fridge, just to see how long it would take to explode. And that was about it. Apart from the endless jars of things that aren't ever going to go off but aren't ever going to be eaten because they look so disgusting. With them, I'm in a stand-off for now.

Michele Hanson: rotting banana

A banana and an apple in Michele Hanson's bathA banana and an apple in Michele Hanson's bath. Photograph: Michele Hanson for the Guardian
I don't like to boast, but there is nothing going off in my fridge. Not a scrap. The wrinkled lemon doesn't count, because I swear I'm going to use it. I give spare salad to the daughter, toast stale bread for the dog, compost all peelings, grow my own grapes and apples, but I do have one rotting banana in the bath. I store my bananas there, because it's the only place the mice can't get them. My friend Rosemary and I feel guilty if we throw the outer leaves of cabbage away. They're very good for soothing engorged breasts. But we're in our 70s. Should we carry them around in case we meet a pregnant woman?

Bim Adewunmi: fuzzy stew

Today my fridge lies unusually empty – I am moving to Berlin for a few months and I've sublet my flat. I always feel terrible about throwing out food. When I was little, my uncle told me that every meal had a hidden blessing, and we had to finish every morsel to guarantee we got it.
But in the days before my departure, I have been forced to chuck out food. Out went the leftover Nigerian spinach stew, fuzzy with age. Also gone was an alarmingly soft red cabbage (I'm no respecter of best-before dates, but 12 August was no match for the crisper drawer) and a wizened old half of lemon. Not too shabby.

Jay Rayner: fermenting sweetcorn

Jay Raynor's fridgeJay Rayner's fridge. Photograph: Jay Rayner for the Guardian
Like any self-regarding member of the devout middle classes, I like to think we have robust food-waste strategies. Any vegetables left over at the end of the week get blitzed up into what is known as Indeterminate Green Soup, and the few things that can't go in get composted. But I look at this photograph of my fridge and I see other crimes against waste, which keep repeating like bad plots in EastEnders. On the top shelf are two pots: one of olives, which I know have been there too long, and another of cheap hummus, which has been there so long it is developing its own personality. I am not a fan of hummus, cheap or otherwise, so I can claim innocence on this one. It is bought for others. Who then don't eat it. On the middle shelf is sweetcorn, which is odd. We know our kids don't really care for it. And yet we keep buying the bloody stuff, not noticing it is there until the sugars have started to ferment and the packaging has started to bow. We throw it away. And then we buy it again. A few days ago we threw away half a pack of bacon. This, I can say, is an aberration. It is rare for bits of pig to get away without being eaten.

Stuart Jeffries: browning broccoli

Stuart Jeffries' quince jellyStuart Jeffries' quince jelly. Photograph: Stuart Jeffries for the Guardian
I'm a pitifully mean, deeply anal keeper of food, but my wife is a thrower. Which makes for "interesting" altercations. At the moment, though, I'm winning. Maybe I'm tripping, but the browning broccoli I found at the bottom of the fridge (use by: 8 Oct) is just the thing to dip into the half-used, possibly rancid jar of quince jelly I'd forgotten about that my sister gave me last year (bottling date: 9 April 2012) and had been lurking behind the mustard. Yummy! The "majestic basil" (use by: 13 Oct) is turning black, but there are still some edible leaves and the rest I'll compost. Maybe I should pre-book an ambulance. Milk and yoghurt, boringly, are within their use-by dates. Shame: I do like a brush with danger from dairy.

Felicity Cloake: pink cheese

Felicity Cloake's fridgeFelicity Cloake's fridge. Photograph: Felicity Cloake for the Guardian
Thanks to recipe testing, I end up with a lot of weird and wonderful ingredients crammed into the fridge – and, perhaps fortunately, it is not humanly possible for me to eat them all. The last things I threw away were a packet of very furry bird's-eye chillies (there are always far more in the pack than I can use) and some blue cheese that had turned intriguingly pink. I do relish the challenge of turning unpromising leftovers into something delicious, though; there are a couple of rashers of bacon, some wilting spinach, a quarter of a red onion and a bit of cream in there at the moment that seem heaven-sent for a pasta lunch. In fact, maybe I shouldn't have chucked that cheese after all …

Tony Naylor: mouldy ginger

I'm very tight, so I throw little out. Although I did recently have to chuck (an oversight, this) a cucumber that had melted and filled the veg drawer with ectoplasm. There is guaranteed be a bit of ginger in the fridge going slightly mouldy, and there is some coleslaw in there that's a few days over, but it's going to get eaten later – cavalier, I know. As for irregular waste: I buy too many eggs and, occasionally, posh fruit, in the vain hope that one day I'll develop a taste for mangoes. A few weeks later, they're in the bin. Again.

Paula Cocozza: bearded mushrooms

There is half an onion, saved in a spirit of good home economics, but whose layers, dried and separating, are as stark a sign of age as the rings of a tree trunk. The mushrooms are fuzzing up with a haze of white feathery whiskers, which, left unattended, will soon be a full beard. I don't mean to let things ruin. I'm a keeper of spoils by conception, but each week a thrower by trade. Even the best intentions grow mouldy, and many of my best intentions are vegetables. I've had this wilting fennel for 10 days, but I haven't given up on it yet. Somewhere inside is a usable bulb, getting smaller and smaller.

Tom Meltzer: tired salad

Tom Meltzer's fridge contentsTom Meltzer's fridge contents. Photograph: Tom Meltzer for the Guardian
I let a lot of food go to waste. Today I had a rummage in the fridge for things I needed to throw out. I found two half-full boxes of mushrooms, three unopened yoghurts, a bag of salad, half a pint of milk and the remains of some pasta. Some of it was more than a month past its sell-by date. By my standards, that's quite good. In the past, I've binned whole fishcakes, salmon fillets, unopened jars of pesto and even steaks. In my defence, I live with five other people. It's easy to lose track of what's yours and what isn't. Plus, when you spontaneously cook together, your individual meal plans tend to go out the window.

Mundine v Mosley cancellation is Australian boxing's latest farce

Anthony Mundine
Anthony Mundine sparring at his father Tony's gym at Redfern in the run-up to his cancelled fight against Shane Mosley. Photograph: Mick Tsikas/AAP Image
Australian boxing’s ability to descend into farce is completely unrivalled. Shane Mosley pulling out of his fight with Anthony Mundine the day before it was due to take place is just the latest in a long line of embarrassments for the sport.
"It's unfortunate that this fight will not be taking place, and we apologise to all of Shane's Australian fans, but there are contracts in place for a reason, and when the terms are not adhered to, we have no choice but to protect our fighter, and that's what happened here," said Richard Schaefer, Mosley's promoter, in a statement. In a 20-year career, Mosley has never done anything similar, so there's no reason to disbelieve him.
The promotion had been dogged by problems from the start; there were rumours of poor ticket sales and “Sugar Shane” had already threatenedto pull out when an earlier sum wasn’t promptly paid. Draw your own conclusions.
It’s a pity, because Mosley v Mundine was actually set to be a pretty good fight. Not because either man is a true contender at this stage; the opposite, it was set to be a good fight because they’re not. The once formidable Mosley is so faded and punch-affected that he had to be subtitled in TV advertisements for the fight, which put him on about the same level as Mundine, who was never a truly world-class fighter.
As much as Mundine is seen in a negative light in many quarters – his comment that America had “brought 9/11 on themselves" still rears its head more than a decade on– this particular cancellation wasn’t his fault, at least not in the short term. And to his credit, he was extremely classy at a press conference this afternoon: "I lay no blame on Mosley. He's just a fighter trying to take care of himself. He's just trying to get paid."
But it’s not difficult to see how his unpopularity with some and previous fights against low-quality opposition led to poor ticket sales and a lack of interest in the promotion. 
His Muhammad Ali/Floyd Mayweather Lite schtick became too much for many to bear when he accused Daniel Geale of being an “Uncle Tom” before their last fight. He boasts that every one of his fights has been on pay-per-view, which means that he has expected his fans to fork out for 49 fights, the vast majority of which were not against world-class fighters. I’d be shocked if anyone outside his immediate family has bought them all.
And Mundine v Mosley offered nothing punters hadn’t seen before. Adown on his luck hall-of-famer, lured to Australia with pile of money – check. A footballer moonlighting as a boxer in a complete and utter mismatch – check. And, of course, a barren undercard light on top-class talent, designed to help everyone catch up on sleep before the main event at midnight.
So what happens now? There’s some talk of the fight being rescheduled in six weeks’ time with Mundine’s manager, Khoder Nasser, as the promoter. But Mosley is unlikely to return and you can hardly blame him.
Australian boxing, meanwhile, has been left with a huge black eye that won’t be remedied with a cold steak. It will be that much more difficult to convince international stars to visit our shores in future. As yet it’s unclear whether the punters who bought tickets to Mundine v Mosley will get refunds. Even if they do, they’ll think twice about buying tickets to a boxing match again. Mundine can’t be blamed completely for Australia’s boxing’s shrunken fanbase and a jaded public but his controversial comments and so-so opponents haven’t helped.
Journalist Phil Lutton suggests the sport needs a crisis summit. That’d be nice, but it won’t happen. If this episode proves anything it’s that boxing is the free market gone wild and nobody is looking out for anyone but themselves.
Luckily Australia still has some very good fighters. Middleweight Daniel Geale, despite a close loss in his last outing, is genuinely world class andnice guy to boot. Former Olympians Jeff Horn and Damien Hooper are both exciting and skilled. There are good fighters at every level training in gyms around the country.
It’s often said that “boxing is dead”. It’s certainly true to say it’s on life support in Australia. But people do love to see blokes punch one another in the head, so fans of the sport just have to hope that the next generation of boxers (and promoters) learn from the mistakes of the current era.

'Go home' billboard vans not a success, says Theresa May

Home Office 'Go Home' van
The government adverts urging illegal immigrants to go home was piloted in six London boroughs, attracting criticism from Liberal Democrat ministers, Labour and Ukip. Photograph: Home Office/PA
A billboard campaign, telling illegal immigrants to "Go home or face arrest" will not be repeated, the home secretary has said. Theresa Mayhas apparently decided the controversial pilot scheme – where twoadvertising vans were driven around displaying the slogan and advertising a helpline advice to illegal migrants who want to leave the UK – was not effective.
The campaign was piloted in six London boroughs, featuring leaflets and posters with the message: "In the UK illegally? Go home or face arrest." The posters proved highly divisive, with Liberal Democrat ministers calling for it to be scrapped. Yvette Cooper, the shadow home secretary, accused the Conservatives of using the "language of the National Front". The scheme also attracted criticism from the UK Independence party.
Sources close to the home secretary told the Daily Mail the idea had not been successful – resulting in the voluntary repatriation of just one person.
The campaign had been robustly defended by Conservative immigration minister Mark Harper. Last week, he told the BBC's Question Time that the campaign might be rolled out across the country: "I don't see any problem with saying to people who have no right to be in the UK… they can't be here any more," he said.

Dave Lee Travis denies assaults

Dave Lee Travis
Dave Lee Travis arrives at Southwark crown court in London on Tuesday morning. Photograph: Peter Macdiarmid/Getty Images
Dave Lee Travis has pleaded not guilty to 14 counts of indecent assault and one count of sexual assault in alleged offences spanning three decades.
The DJ denied the string of charges in a brief hearing at Southwark crown court on Tuesday morning.
He is accused of 14 counts of indecent assault between 1976 and 2003, and one count of sexual assault between June 2003 and November 2008.
Travis, who answered to his real name David Griffin, stood alongside a court guard in the dock as he entered 15 pleas of not guilty.
He is due to go on trial on 14 January for up to six weeks.
The judge, Anthony Leonard, ordered Travis to return to Southwark crown court on 13 January for a pre-trial hearing and released him on bail.
When told he must appear at the next hearing, the entertainer nodded once and said: "I understand."
The former BBC Radio 1 DJ had made no comment as he entered court through a media scrum

Temporary migrants cost NHS up to £2bn a year, says study

Jeremy Hunt
Jeremy Hunt, the health secretary. Photograph: Oli Scarff/Getty Images
The coalition has launched a fresh assault on so-called health tourists by saying short-term immigrants and foreign visitors should pay more than £500m a year towards the cost of their NHS care.
Jeremy Hunt, the health secretary, will present a new analysis suggesting temporary migrants are costing the NHS up to £2bn a year, and arguing this could be reduced by a quarter through a charge on new arrivals, better enforcement of the current rules and discouraging people from abusing the system.
The Department of Health commissioned the research after a political row erupted this year over how much health tourism costs the UK. Hunt was heavily criticised for claiming that it cost the taxpayer significantly more than £200m a year, while the NHS had only recorded £33m of charges to foreign nationals, of which £12m was written off.
Hunt will claim that the analysis by Creative Research is vindication of his figures, as MPs prepare to debate the new immigration bill. This will impose a £200 surcharge on temporary migrants coming to Britain for six to 12 months, paid when they arrive, to help cover the cost of their medical care. Creative Research said this would raise about £200m a year.
The report says the cost of immigrants who are already in Britain but not eligible for free treatment is £388m. Hunt is appointing a new NHS director of costs, Sir Keith Pearson, to help the health service get better at charging this group of immigrants for treatment.
The research estimates that the taxpayer will save between £70m and £300m because the government's tougher approach to discouraging health tourists will deter many trying to get free treatment in Britain.
"These independent reports prove this is a serious problem that the government was right to address," said Hunt. "We are confident our new measures will make the NHS fairer and more sustainable for the British families and taxpayers it was set up to serve."
The claims were challenged by Labour, and doctors raised concerns that GPs did not have the capacity to act as border guards monitoring patients' immigration status.
Dr Clare Gerada, chair of the Royal College of GPs, dismissed Hunt's initiative, saying GPs "must not be the Border Agency", adding: "You are more likely to be cared for by an immigrant than encounter a health tourist in the queue."
Dr Chaand Nagpaul, chair of the British Medical Association's GP committee, said there was "limited evidence to suggest that migrants or short-term visitors are consuming large parts of the NHS budget".
"The government's estimates are based on a number of assumptions that result in a figure significantly higher than previous estimates," he said. "GPs and other healthcare professionals do not have the capacity or the resources to administer an extended charging system that could require GPs to extensively vet every single patient when they register with a new practice.
"This would cause inconvenience to all patients and put additional strain on already overstretched GP services that are currently under pressure from rising patient demand and falling resources. It is doubtful that the expensive bureaucracy required to support an extended charging system would recoup enough money to cover the costs of setting it up in the first place."
Nagpaul also warned the government not to deter people from seeking treatment when they needed it. "Not only would this present a risk to the health of that individual, it could also prevent the NHS from identifying individuals with contagious diseases and result in further costs to the NHS should a patient's condition deteriorate to the extent they require more expensive emergency treatment later on," he said.
A Labour source claimed the figures produced by the government were already unravelling.
The report itself contains a note of caution, saying all of its estimates are "subject to varying degrees of uncertainty, relating to the numbers of people and their behaviour".
"The estimates for health tourism, as for any unlawful activity, are impossible to estimate with confidence and are a structured judgment," it says. "The estimates for chargeability are also uncertain because of the complexity of the rules. The estimates are presented as the best that can be made at present, recognising that they are based on incomplete data, sometimes of varying quality, and a large number of assumptions. The analysis is intended to inform policy development around visitor and migrant access to NHS, alongside the DH consultation and work with the NHS."
Andy Burnham, the shadow health secretary, said his party was in favour of charging people with no entitlement to NHS treatment, but the government-backed report appeared to be "more about spin than substance".
"The government's own report undermines their headline-grabbing figures, admitting they are based on old and incomplete data," he said. "Instead of grandstanding, the government need to focus on delivering practical changes. Labour would not support changes that make doctors and nurses surrogate immigration officials."
A spokesman for Hunt said the analysis was based on two separate reports from independent expert market research consultancies – Prederi and Creative Research – which were reviewed by three independent peer reviewers with expertise in modelling and health research.

PM calls Facebook irresponsible for allowing beheading clips


Facebook
Facebook introduced a temporary ban on beheading videos in May but has since decided to remove the block. Photograph: Dave Thompson/PA
David Cameron has waded into the row over Facebook's decision to allow a video of a beheading to appear on its site, branding it "irresponsible" and saying the social networking site should explain it to "worried parents".
The prime minister tweeted that Facebook should put up a warning about the video – a move that sources close to the company say it is considering.
The row blew up after the company went back on a ban imposed in May on the posting of footage showing such killings. It said that it was only allowing the present video – which shows a masked man killing a woman in Mexico – because people were sharing the video to condemn it.
Yet Facebook's rules, under "nudity and pornography", would ban the display of topless photos.
Stephen Balkam, a member of the Facebook safety advisory board, urged the company to rethink the change in its policy. He told Sky News: "They have some very strict rules about nudity, about sex and even about violence, too. I just think in this case they really need to rethink how they use and how they adopt their own policies."
Facebook has said users should be free to view such videos and then condemn the content – and that it would take a different approach if the actions in the footage were "encouraged or celebrated".
Sources close to Facebook have indicated that the company is keeping its policies under close review as the furore over the posting of the video grew.
While it does have a "Like" button, to indicate approval, Facebook doesn't have any clear way for users to indicate dislike of content – meaning that it is hard for outsiders to know how the company could measure the basis on which people are viewing a video.
A Facebook spokeswoman said: "Facebook has long been a place where people turn to share their experiences, particularly when they're connected to controversial events on the ground, such as human rights abuses, acts of terrorism and other violent events."