Tuesday, 8 October 2013

Ronaldinho.. Would PSG offered him a Contract ??

Ronaldinho: I want to retire at PSG
The Selecao legend has revealed that he would be open to finishing up at the Parc des Princes, where he spent two seasons before moving to Barcelona
Atletico Mineiro playmaker Ronaldinho has revealed that he could imagine ending his career at Paris Saint-Germain.

The former Brazil ace played for les Parisiens between 2001 and 2003 and says he could picture himself bringing the curtain down on his illustrious career at the Parc des Princes.

"Today, I do think about the future," the 33-year-old told reporters. "But any player would be delighted to have the opportunity to finish his career in a big club like PSG.

"PSG are very strong at the moment; a great team."

He then praised his fellow countryman Lucas Moura, who he believes has the potential to become one of game's top players. 

"Lucas is a guy who has the means to conquer the world, thanks to his quality and speed. Soon the whole world will applaud him," the World Cup winner said of the PSG winger.

Ronaldinho left PSG for Barcelona, where he enjoyed the most productive years of his career, with the gifted No.10 winning two Liga titles and a Champions League during his five-year stay at Camp Nou.

Klopp rules out Dortmund move for De Bruyne

Klopp rules out Dortmund move for De Bruyne
It had been claimed that die Schwarzgelben were interested in the Belgian but even the player's agent insists there is no chance of him leaving Stamford Bridge
Jurgen Klopp has dismissed speculation that Borussia Dortmund might make a January move for Chelseamidfielder Kevin De Bruyne.

Despite featuring in the Blues' opening two games of the new Premier League season, the Belgium international has reportedly fallen out of favour with coach Jose Mourinho.

However, Klopp insists there is no truth in the rumour that Dortmund are considering signing De Bruyne on loan.

"We have signed great players over the summer," Klopp told Deutsche Presseagentur. "We have a squad we are very happy with.

"He [De Bruyne] is actually not one we are after. He is at Chelsea, and given the size and quality of the Chelsea first-team squad, it's quite usual he may sometimes miss out on one or two matches."

Furthermore, while De Bruyne spent last season on loan with another Bundesliga outfit, Werder Bremen, the 22-year-old's agent, Patrick De Koster, is adamant that there is no chance of his client leaving Stamford Bridge before the end of the season.

"This summer we decided to stay with Chelsea, and we knew the competition would be hard and that Kevin had to fight," he told Bild.

"He will continue fighting. I have no contact to other clubs. Even if we were in the transfer period, I would not have any contact."

De Bruyne joined Chelsea from Racing Genk last summer before immediately being sent to the Weserstadion.

Will it be Shaan vs Akshay Kumar this Eid?

Waar is expected to do better at the local box office over Boss. PHOTO: FILE
Waar is expected to do better at the local box office over Boss. PHOTO: FILE
On Eidul Fitr, Shahrukh Khan’s Chennai Express and Humayun Saeed’s Main Hoon Shahid Afridi (MHSA) were expected to clash at the box office. However, at the eleventh hour, MHSA’s release was ultimately delayed as a result of which one couldn’t really gauge the audience’s response when a mainstream Pakistani film would be in competition with a big-budget Bollywood film. And now, with Eidul Azha around the corner, it’s time for Shaan’s Waar and Akshay Kumar’s Boss to hit the screens simultaneously!
So far, Boss has been advertised for a local release with subject to censors while distributors of Waar are aiming to capture around 50 screens in Pakistan. If Boss is not forced into a delay or a possible ban by committees that often visit the culture ministry to “protect the national interest” then, the local box office this Eid would portray the true potential of a big-budget Pakistani film in presence of a genuine competitor.
If both films release on Eid, then Waar is expected to do better business at the local box office, whereas Boss is just going to steal a minor share of its success refraining Waar from reaching a major milestone. Nonetheless, the audiences and multiplexes will have two big films to choose from and the footfall of one film will help the other

Bale must stand up to Ronaldo to succeed at Madrid - Redknapp

Bale must stand up to Ronaldo to succeed at Madrid - Redknapp
The QPR boss insists the Welshman needs to work with the Portuguese superstar while not being intimidated by him if he is to justify his world-record price tag
Gareth Bale will have to stand up to Cristiano Ronaldo if he is to survive and thrive at Real Madrid, according to former manager Harry Redknapp.

Bale, who first broke into the Tottenham team under the current QPR boss, eclipsed Ronaldo's transfer record by making an €100 million move to Real Madrid this summer.

And Redknapp believes Santiago Bernabeu's biggest superstar presents the biggest obstacle to the Welshman making a success of his time in Spain.

"His biggest test will be to step out of the shadow of Cristiano Ronaldo with confidence. That won’t be easy," the QPR boss wrote in his new autobiography, serialised in the Daily Mail.

"Ronaldo is a huge star at Madrid and will probably want to take nine out of 10 free-kicks - at least. Gareth will have to assert himself and that will require a strong mind.

"He has to think ‘I’m an £86million player’ and act like it, taking responsibility, claiming the ball when he fancies his chances. 

"And yet at the same time he cannot dwell on his fee and what it means too much because that would put him under immense pressure. It is a tricky balancing act. 

"He will have to be ready for the matches when he goes it alone, has a shot, misses and Ronaldo starts throwing his arms up in the air.

"He cannot, at that point, go into his shell and become this timid little creature. But it is not natural for Gareth to behave in an assertive way. Don’t get me wrong, he knows he is good. 

"The fee is crazy, amazing money, but he wouldn’t have fought so hard to get the deal done if he didn’t fancy his chances of living up to expectations in Madrid.

"Yet, equally, Gareth is a quiet lad, who spends time with his girlfriend and family, and I’m not sure being in the same bracket as Ronaldo and Lionel Messi will suit him.

"If Ronaldo feels threatened by Gareth’s arrival, Madrid could be a lonely place so he will need to lean a lot on Ancelotti, who speaks good English, and Paul Clement, Carlo’s assistant, who is English.

"Luka Modric is another old friend who could help him settle in.

"The one thing the club cannot provide for Gareth and Cristiano is a ball each — so they will need to work hard on that partnership because they are such similar players."

Redknapp insists he recognised Bale's potential very early on - even if the Welshman did seem a little too preoccupied with his hairstyle.

"He drove me mad in training," the QPR boss added. "Technically, he was outstanding but he always seemed to be playing with his hair. It was never right. 

"He’d be flicking the fringe or wiping it out of his eyes and I would be going quietly mad, just watching. ‘Gareth, leave your barnet alone! Gareth! Stop touching your hair!’

Samsung is in danger??

Samsung Apple
Samsung and its US lawyers could face sanctions after a secret patent licence between Apple and Nokia was distributed to scores of Samsung staff, breaking a court order.
Judge Paul Grewal has ordered one of Samsung's patent licensing team, as well as five other Samsung staff who have been identified by Apple in a court filing, to appear in front of him by 16 October. A further heading is scheduled for 22 October.
More than 90 Samsung staff could have seen the document, marked "Highly Confidential Attorney Eyes Only", in breach of a court confidentiality order.
Grewal's order follows complaints by Apple and Nokia that staff from the South Korean manufacturer learnt details of their secret June 2011 patent licensing deal from a document that was meant to be restricted solely to an expert witness, David Teece, who was writing an opinion on Samsung's behalf for last year's patent court battle with Apple.
Samsung, or its lawyers, may be liable for a fine under California's lawsfor breaking the court's order on the protection of the confidential information - though it's unclear whether that is the only option open to Grewal if he should find against Samsung or its law company, Quinn Emanuel.
Samsung's lawyer admitted in a court hearing before the order that a junior member of the law firm had failed to redact terms of the licence deal correctly, leaving them visible to Samsung executives who should not have been able to see them. But he argued that this was not a violation of the court order which is meant to keep such details secret, because it was not intentional.
It is not the first time that Samsung staff have been accused of making use of confidential information about Apple's business plans. In September 2011, Suk-Joo Hwang, a former manager at the company,testified that in December 2009 he had passed confidential shipping data about components for the Apple iPad - then not even announced - to members of a US hedge fund. Hwang received immunity from prosecution in return for his testimony.

Obstruction over disclosure

In the current case, Apple complained that Samsung had obstructed its attempts to find out how many people had seen the licences without permission, and failed to say whether it was using the wrongly-acquired material in other court proceedings - including one ongoing in the US.
Samsung had failed to give Apple any information about who had seen the licensing terms in the three months since Nokia had raised the topic, Apple's counsel said. And Samsung's lawyers had actually been aware of the breach of the court order since December 2012, Apple's lawyer claimed.
According to a declaration from Nokia's chief intellectual property officer Paul Melin of a meeting with Samsung licensing executives on 4 June, Seungho Ahn told Nokia that he already knew the details of the licence - and stated that Apple had produced the licence as part of its litigation with Samsung, and that Samsung's lawyers had provided him with a copy. "All information leaks," Ahn was quoted as saying, in Melin's declaration.
The Apple-Nokia deal is highly secret, and was struck by the two companies to cover a number of essential and non-essential patents in June 2011, after years of litigation following the launch of the original iPhone in 2007.
Apple made a one-off payment and agreed to make a number of ongoing royalty payments, and licensed some of its own patents to Nokia. The terms of the licence were never released - and like all patent licence deals, were treated as highly secret.
If the details of the deal were made public, or revealed to a competitor, it would mean that they would know how the two sides valued their patents - and so weaken them in future negotiations because it removes their ability to negotiate on price or value against someone whose prices and values are unknown.

'Fox investigating the henhouse'

Grewal's order contains harsh, if veiled, criticism of Samsung. "It is possible that Dr Ahn's encounter with Mr Melin occurred very differently. Unfortunately, the court cannot say, because Samsung has elected not to provide the court with any sworn testimony from Dr Ahn or anyone else at the meeting," the judge notes in his order. "Samsung also has failed to supply the court with any evidence at all regarding other uses of the Apple-Nokia licence, or those of the other confidential licencees [Ericsson, Sharp and Philips, which were also mentioned in the document].
"In fact, despite acknowledging that many dozens of individuals at Samsung and its other council have knowledge of confidential licence terms that they had no right to access, at yesterday's hearing, Samsung's counsel repeatedly denied even one violation of the protective order, asserting that such a violation can only occur wilfully." He called Samsung's offers in the matter "insufficient".
He called the hiring by Samsung's lawyer of an outside company to examine Samsung's systems "the fox [being] permitted to investigate… the disappearance of chickens at the henhouse."
Apple made a copy of the licence available to Samsung's lawyers in March 2012 only for the purpose of Teece's analysis, in which he was writing an expert opinion for the Apple-Samsung case in Northern California. There, Apple was suing Samsung over a number of design and technical patents, while Samsung was claiming that Apple had infringed a number of Samsung's standards-essential patents. The jury decided in Apple's favour and against Samsung.
Samsung's lawyer was at pains during the court hearing ahead of Grewal's order to avoid suggestions that the South Korean company - which has battled in a number of countries with Apple over patent matters - had derived the information from the leaked document, despite being unable to say who inside the company had seen it.

'Nothing wrong has happened here'

Asked by Grewal whether the information that had leaked had been used in any negotiations, Samsung's lawyer said: "I'm denying that confidential information governed by the protective order learned that Samsung, that Samsung learned about from inadvertent disclosures, was used in a negotiation."
Susan Estrich, for Quinn Emanuel, insisted to Grewal that "Nothing wrong has happened here" but admitted that "Yes, there was a disclosure." She added: "Was it wilful - in this case, no." She said that courts have not previously sanctioned those where the disclosure is not wilful, and where those involved take measures to remedy the situation.
But Judge Grewal admonished Estrich and Samsung for their lack of action: "You've just told me you can't even tell me whether you've taken any steps in any of these other tribunals [where Samsung and Apple are fighting patent battles] to retract reliance upon this information."
Estrich said that the error occurred when "an associated redacted [the Apple-Nokia licence for Teece] - it wasn't as if we sent [out] a report with no redactions. He made a mistake. He left in a footnote that should have been redacted. There were two additional paragraphs."
The insiufficiently redacted document was then placed on an FTP site controlled by Quinn Emanuel, where Samsung staff and Teece could access documents needed for the court case in summer 2012. But the law firm said it has no record of who accessed the site - and had now employed a third party company called Stroz to make enquiries inside Samsung about who had downloaded the file and who had emailed it.
Samsung's staff offered to delete all the emails involving the file when Nokia raised objections at the meeting in June - which Melin, for Nokia, immediately insisted it could not do. If a violation of court privacy is suspected, the law says that the extent of the violation must be determined; deleting emails or other information would constitute destruction of evidence.
Apple's lawyer complained that Samsung has used the information from the disclosure "to craft arguments at the ITC [International Trade Commission, which can impose import bans to the US for patent violation]. "The ITC issued an opinion on the licensing negotiations that specifically accepted Samsung's argument in which this confidential information was used."
Samsung declined to comment or to confirm any of the details of the meeting with Nokia.
A Nokia spokesperson said: "There is nothing we can add to the court documents at this stage."

More to know?

What the world's fastest computer tells us about China's absorptive state

Tianhe-2
Deep inside China's National University of Defence Technology, on the outskirts of Changsha, a computer is whirring. But this is no ordinary machine. With 3.1 million Intel Core processors, 1.4 petabytes of RAM and the capacity to perform 33,860 trillion calculations per second, it is the fastest supercomputer on the planet.
In June 2013, China surprised observers by seizing the number one spot in the TOP500, a twice yearly ranking of the world's fastest supercomputers. The Tianhe-2 (or Milky Way-2) was successfully tested almost two years ahead of schedule. Funded by the Chinese government's 863 High Technology Program, with additional support from Guangdong province, it will eventually be deployed at the National Supercomputer Centre in Guangzhou, where it will be used by researchers from across southern China.
Tianhe-2 is the most impressive result to date of a well-funded and targeted drive by China to move to the fore of supercomputing. It has knocked the US Department of Energy's Titan machine off the No.1 position, and although the US still dominates the TOP500 (occupying 252 places in the table), China with 66 places is catching up fast.
The race is now on to see which country will be the first to reach exascale: by producing a supercomputer capable of one quintillion calculations per second. The US, EU, Japan, India and Russia all have substantial research programmes directed towards this goal. But most experts expect China to get there first. In his 2011 State of the Union address, President Obama warned that "This is our generation's Sputnik moment", as he highlighted supercomputing as one of several fields in which the US was in danger of falling behind. Two years on, an exascale strategic plan has only just been submitted to the US Congress, and the prospects for new funding look uncertain.
In one sense, Tianhe-2 is an achievement that the Americans should be every bit as proud of as the Chinese. It was built using US-designed Intel chips, and while the Chinese media lauded Tianhe-2 as an "independently-developed" technology, some users of the social media platform Weibo remained sceptical. But TOP500 editor Jack Dongarrapoints out that "Most of the features of [Tianhe-2] were developed in China, and they are only using Intel for the main compute part…the interconnect, operating system, front-end processors and software are mainly Chinese." Other analysts agree that it won't be long before China produces its first entirely home-grown supercomputer.
Tianhe-2 is just one example of how China is becoming a more significant force in global science and innovation. This is partly a story of massive and sustained investment: in 2012, China's total R&D expenditure exceeded ¥1 trillion RMB ($163 billion USD). Since 2008, it has maintained 18 per cent year-on-year increases in research spending, in a period when the effects of the global financial crisis have seen investment flat-line or fall in the UK and other countries. As a result, China now accounts for 13 per cent of the world's scientific papers, up from 5 per cent a decade ago.
Supercomputing is one of several priority sectors in which foreign technologies are being absorbed, adapted and improved. The same process has occurred with a number of the technologies that China is most proud of, including its high-speed rail networkadvanced nuclear reactors and the Shenzhou spacecraft.
These examples suggest that what China's President Xi Jinping has termed "innovation with Chinese characteristics" will not be a straightforward path from imported to home-grown innovation, but a messier process in which the lines between Chinese and non-Chinese ideas, technologies and capabilities are harder to draw.
In a Nesta report, which will be published next week to coincide with the first high-level UK government delegation to Beijing for over a year, we argue that China can now be characterised as an "absorptive state": increasingly adept at attracting and profiting from global knowledge and networks alongside its more supportive domestic environment for research and development.
The concept of "absorptive capacity" is well-established in debates about innovation at the level of individual firms. It can also be used to describe regional or national innovation systems; an earlier Nesta report defines it as "the ability of one place to absorb and adopt knowledge coming from another place." It is an idea which features in China's own policies, notably in its 2006-2020 Medium to Long Term Program for Science and Technology Development, which talks of "enhancing original innovation… based on assimilation and absorption of imported technology." And for potential partners like the UK, the notion of China as an absorptive state speaks to ongoing concerns about how to strike the right balance between competition and collaboration in the "global race" that is now a mantra of so many ministerial speeches.
Science and innovation are caught up in a bigger unfolding debate about the pace, scale and direction of China's economic and political reforms. Much still depends upon the playing out of a set of tensions: between the planned economy and the market; the hardware of research infrastructure and the software of culture and ethics; the skills and creativity of home-grown talent, and the entrepreneurialism and networks of returnees.
In the next decade, China is likely to change the way we think about science and innovation as much as science and innovation change China. In a series of posts this week on Political Science, we want to explore what these shifts will mean for China and for the wider world.

Malala Yousafzai

Malala Yousafzai says she's lost herself. "In Swat [district], I studied in the same school for 10 years and there I was just considered to be Malala. Here I'm famous, here people think of me as the girl who was shot by the Taliban. The real Malala is gone somewhere, and I can't find her."
  1. I Am Malala: The Girl Who Stood Up for Education and was Shot by the Taliban
  2. by Malala Yousafzai, Christina Lamb
  1. Tell us what you think:Star-rate and review this book
We are sitting in a boardroom on the seventh floor of the new Birmingham library, the glass walls allowing us a view of a city draped in mist, a sharp contrast to the "paradise" of Swat, with its tall mountains and clear rivers which Malala recalls wistfully. It should be desperately sad but the world's most famous 16-year-old makes it difficult for you to feel sorry for her. In part, it is because she is so poised, in a way that suggests an enviable self-assurance rather than an overconstructed persona. But more than that, it is to do with how much of her conversation is punctuated by laughter.
The laughter takes many forms: self-deprecating when I ask her why she thinks theTaliban feel threatened by her; delighted when she talks of Skyping her best friend, Muniba, to get the latest gossip from her old school; wry when she recalls a Taliban commander's advice that she return to Pakistan and enter a madrassa; giggly when she talks about her favourite cricketers ("Shahid Afridi, of course, and I also like Shane Watson"). And it's at its most full-throated when she is teasing her father, who is present for part of our interview. It happens during a conversation about her mother: "She loves my father," Malala says. Then, lowering her voice, she adds: "They had a love marriage." Her father, involved in making tea for Malala and me, looks up. "Hmmm? Are you sure?" he says, mock-stern. "Learn from your parents!" Malala says to me, and bursts into laughter.
Learning from her parents is something Malala knows a great deal about. Her mother was never formally educated and an awareness of the constraints this placed on her life have made her a great supporter of Malala and her father in their campaign against the Taliban's attempts to stop female education. One of the more moving details in I Am Malala, the memoir Malala has written with the journalist Christina Lamb, is that her mother was due to start learning to read and write on the day Malala was shot – 9 October 2012. When I suggest that Malala's campaign for female education may have played a role in encouraging her mother, she says: "That might be." But she is much happier giving credit to her mother's determined character, and the example provided by her father, Ziauddin, who long ago set up a school where girls could study as well as boys, in a part of the world where the gender gap in education is vast.
Malala in hospitalThe 15-year-old pictured at Queen Elizabeth hospital in Birmingham, to which she had been rushed for an operation. Photograph: University Hospitals Birmingham/PA
It is hard to refrain from asking Ziauddin Yousafzai the "do you wish you hadn't …?" question about his daughter, whose passion for reform clearly owes a lot to the desire to emulate her education-activist father. But it's a cruel question, and unfair, too, given my own inability to work out what constitutes responsible parenting in a world where girls are told that the safest way to live is to stay away from school, and preferably disappear entirely.
It is perhaps because of criticism levelled at her father that Malala mentions more than once in her book that no one believed the Taliban would target a schoolgirl, even if that schoolgirl had been speaking and writing against the Taliban's ban on female education since the age of 12. If any member of the family was believed to be in danger, it was Ziauddin Yousafzai, as much a part of the campaign as his daughter. And it was the daughter who urged the father to keep on when he suggested they both "go into hibernation" after receiving particularly worrisome threats. The most interesting detail to emerge about Ziauddin from his daughter's book is his own early flirtation with militancy. He was only 12 years old when Sufi Mohammad, who would later be a leading figure among the extremists in Swat, came to his village to recruit young boys to join the jihad against the Soviets in Afghanistan. Although Ziauddin was too young to fight then, within a few years he was preparing to become a jihadi, and praying for martyrdom. He later came to recognise what he experienced as brainwashing – and was saved from it by his questioning mind and the influence of his future brother-in-law, a secular nationalist.
The information about her father's semi-brainwashing forms an interesting backdrop to Malala's comments when I ask if she ever wonders about the man who tried to kill her on her way back from school that day in October last year, and why his hands were shaking as he held the gun – a detail she has picked up from the girls in the school bus with her at the time; she herself has no memory of the shooting. There is no trace of rancour in her voice when she says: "He was young, in his 20s … he was quite young, we may call him a boy. And it's hard to have a gun and kill people. Maybe that's why his hand was shaking. Maybe he didn't know if he could do it. But people are brainwashed. That's why they do things like suicide attacks and killing people. I can't imagine it – that boy who shot me, I can't imagine hurting him even with a needle. I believe in peace. I believe in mercy."
Well, I believe in these things, too, but if someone put a bullet in my head I suspect I would be more than a little irate. Doesn't she feel at all angry? "I only get angry at my brothers, and at my father," she says. Particularly her brother Khushal, who is two years younger than her. "I can't be good to him, it's impossible. We can't ever be friends," she says, sounding like the teenager she is.
Indian schoolgirlsSchoolgirls in New Delhi wear Malala masks as part of a campaign to win greater resources for education in India. Photograph: Altaf Qadri/AP
Perhaps meditating on the value of peace and mercy is an entirely sane way of coping with bullets and invective. But, all the same, it must hurt to find yourself reviled – and not only by the Taliban. In her book she writes of how her speech at the UN received plaudits around the world, but in Pakistan people accused her of seeking fame and the luxury of a life abroad. When I ask her about this, it is one of the only times in the conversation that she turns to Urdu to express herself: "Dukh to insaan ko hota hai jab daikhta hai kay uss ka bhai uss kay khilaf hai." ("Naturally it's hurtful when you see your brothers turn against you.") Her voice is pained, but she quickly switches to English and the more philosophical tone emerges again. "Pakistanis can't trust," she says. "They've seen in history that people, particularly politicians, are corrupt. And they're misguided by people in the name of Islam. They're told: 'Malala is not a Muslim, she's not in purdah, she's working for America.' They say maybe she's with the CIA or ISI [Pakistan's intelligence service]. It's fine; they say it about every politician too, and I want to become a politician."
That line is a joke, insofar as she sees the humour in it; but it is nonetheless a statement of intent. She really does believe she will go back to Pakistan – "inshallah, soon" – and replies like a seasoned politician when I ask which political party she'll join. "I haven't chosen any party yet because people choose parties when they get older. When it's time I'll look and if I can't find one to join, I'll make another party."
She is, at first, similarly noncommittal about what she thinks of conversations around the burqa in the UK. "I don't have a specific idea about that," she says. But quickly, it's clear she does. "I believe it's a woman's right to decide what she wants to wear and if a woman can go to the beach and wear nothing, then why can't she also wear everything?" Having said that, she doesn't think a woman should cover her face in court or in other places "where it's necessary to show your identity. I don't cover my face because I want to show my identity."
Malala laughingMalala Yousafzai: her laughter takes many forms, from self-deprecating about why the Taliban feel threatened by her to giggly when talking about cricketers. Photograph: Christopher Thomond for the Guardian
This desire to be visible meant she wasn't at all happy, aged 12, when the BBC insisted that she use a pen name to write her diary of a schoolgirl living under the Taliban. "I still think, why didn't I write as Malala? But the BBC was doing it for my security. They didn't want me to be killed for" – and here she laughs – "writing a diary for BBC Urdu. So, if you look at it in another way, they were really kind because they were thinking about my life." She clearly believes the decision was as misguided as it was well-intentioned. You can't campaign invisibly.
I try to draw her on the question of how she finds life in the UK, and what an average day is like. There is clearly something of culture shock – quite other than the fact that the girls in school don't see "the real Malala". She says the environment here is different to everything she knew before – the way the girls interact, their manner of gossip and play, are all unfamiliar. And everyone takes education for granted; school isn't the "Aladdin's lamp … the doorway to a magical world" as it was for the girls in Swat. For the moment, it seems her main concern is how many A grades she will get in her GCSEs next year, but "the hard thing is now my life is very busy and I have so many responsibilities and duties that I need to fulfil."
Unlikely as a 16-year-old with a burning passion for reform and education might be, there is no doubt she is entirely genuine. In fact, the points at which I found myself raising an eyebrow at her book had nothing to do with extraordinary maturity or resolve but, rather, references to Justin Bieber and Twilight which seem forced in by someone trying to point out that in some ways she is "a normal teenager". When I bring up pop culture, it's the only time she appears to be on the back foot. She struggles to tell me names of Pakistani singers she likes, and finally comes up with "the woman who sang Ek Bar Muskara Do" (Smile Just Once) – the name she is looking for is Munni Begum, a classical singer who did a well-known cover of that 1972 song, years before Malala was born. When I tell her the question isn't important she says that she does like some English-language songs, but "most of them I can't understand. They say words and words and words, and I don't know what they're telling me. I like songs with a meaning."
It isn't that she doesn't have any interests beyond her education campaign; it's just that "a normal teenager" in Swat isn't defined by Justin Bieber and Twilight. If you really want to get her animated, talk about the one subject that can make almost any Pakistani turn into a bit of a teenager: cricket. She follows it closely on TV (which isn't unusual for girls in Pakistan), and also plays (which is). When she sees that I am interested in talking to her about the game everything in her poised manner changes. Within seconds she's calling out "Howzat!" and "Siiiiiix!" and showing me the deficiencies of her bowling action (she's a wrist spinner, though she prefers to bat). When I mention the Birmingham women's cricket club she says: "Yeah, I would like to join them."
Malala Amnesty award

She is so entirely sparkling and alive, with no sign of the Taliban or education or responsibilities intruding on her memories of playing cricket on the rooftop of her house with the mountains as backdrop, that I wish I could take her to Lord's instead of plying her with questions. Does it get lonely, knowing there is no one else in the world who has had the same experience as her? I don't just mean being shot by the Taliban, which is a tragically common experience, but the attention that followed. It's the only time she doesn't understand what I am asking her. I explain and she says: "When someone tells me about Malala, the girl who was shot by the Taliban – that's my definition for her – I don't think she's me. Now I don't even feel as if I was shot. Even my life in Swat feels like a part of history or a movie I watched. Things change. God has given us a brain and a heart which tell us how to live."
The interview ends soon after and the photographer is in the middle of taking pictures when the door opens and her father, who had left halfway through the interview, walks in with a group made up mostly of men. At their head is Chaudhry Abdul Majeed, the prime minister of Azad Jammu and Kashmir. Photographs are taken, everyone sits down, and the prime minister starts talking – about what I already can't remember. He is still talking when I leave the room, and still talking when I turn around for my last glimpse of Malala: she is sitting silently, stoically, being talked at. The girl who shouted "Howzat!" has disappeared and in her place is Malala, the girl who was shot by the Taliban.