Monday, 7 October 2013

Muhammad Ali's biggest fight – for justice – comes to life in style

Muhammad Ali
"Nobody sings Dylan like Dylan" was how the record company's slogan put it back in the 1960s. Equally, nobody plays Ali like Ali, then or now. So it was sensible of the director Stephen Frears and the screenwriter Shawn Slovo to mix original newsreel footage with newly shot material when putting together their film Muhammad Ali's Greatest Fight, which they presented to an audience at the British Film Institute on Tuesday night.
Its US premiere took place 24 hours later in Louisville, Kentucky, Ali's home town, kicking off Three Days of Greatness, a gala at which humanitarian awards were presented in the boxer's name to recipients including Jimmy Carter and Christina Aguilera. No one who saw it on either side of the Atlantic this week could doubt that if any sceptic, at any time in the future, were to question the wider significance of Ali's life, this film would at least start the job of putting them straight.
In this telling, Ali's greatest fight was not the Rumble in the Jungle or theThriller in Manila. Based on accounts in a book of the same name written a dozen years ago by Howard Bingham, the magazine photographer who became Ali's close friend, the film focuses on the events surrounding the US Supreme Court's decision in 1971 not to send the boxer to jail for his refusal to be drafted into the services during the Vietnam war. It was a moment at which the civil rights and anti-war struggles intersected, giving vital publicity and impetus to protests aimed at persuading the US government to extract its armed forces – with their disproportionate number of black servicemen – from south-east Asia.
Slovo told the London audience that, since Supreme Court deliberations are not minuted or otherwise recorded, it had been necessary to invent the exchanges leading up to the historic verdict by a group of judges whose average at the time was north of 70. She relied on the known histories of the nine men, who are played by a group of distinguished actors, led by Christopher Plummer, Frank Langella and Danny Glover.
"There's a kind of freedom in that lack of documentation," Slovo said, and if that is true, then she has used the freedom effectively to depict a body created to be free from political influence and yet whose chief justice, Warren Burger (played by Langella), was clearly operating according to the wishes of President Nixon.
For dramatic purposes, the screenwriter also created a group of younger lawyers attached to the individual justices, among whom the debate rages most fiercely. The most significant of them – the one whose commitment tips the balance – is played by Benjamin Walker, a 31-year-old American actor who was also present on Tuesday, telling the audience that, although he had boxed as a youth, he had been unaware of the details or the significance of the story with which the film deals.
"This was a time," Walker added, rather wistfully, "when young people were more involved in politics than I imagine they are today." You can say that again. And among the figures who inspired the young people of half a century ago was a boxer who, in Walker's words, "had the ability to remain composed and articulate in the face of a massive amount of opposition".
Frears, who so successfully cast Helen Mirren as the Queen and is currently making a film about Lance Armstrong with Ben Foster in the lead role, expressed his relief at not having to find an actor to play Ali. By using the newsreel footage to tell the story of Ali's rise, his conversion to Islam and his confrontation with the authorities, he injects immediacy and momentum to the narrative that unfolds within the Supreme Court building.
To boxing fans, Ali's legal battle perhaps took second place to his achievements in the ring. But Frears pointed out that, even after winning his world title back against George Foreman in Zaire in 1974, Ali was still enraged by the memory of the years stolen from him by the political establishment.
Cinemas no longer offer double bills, but I was fortunate to walk into Muhammad Ali's Greatest Fight straight from seeing Nothing But a Man, a 1964 film by the director Michael Roemer, little seen at the time but now restored and being shown at the BFI. Set in Birmingham, Alabama just before the civil rights movement broke surface, it deals with a young black man whose attempt to settle down and live a decent life is disrupted when he is sacked for attempting to unionise his co-workers at a sawmill and finds himself suddenly being turned away by other potential employers.
Shot in black and white, in the style of Italian neo-realist cinema, it captures the texture of life among men whose pride is destroyed by socio-economic powerlessness and women who have to cope with the consequences. Music – whether the gospel choir in a Baptist church or the sound of Martha and the Vandellas throbbing from jukeboxes, car windows and back doors – is everywhere.
Roemer and Robert M Young, his collaborator on the screenplay, end the film on a note of optimism, with the young couple at the centre of the film, played by Ivan Dixon and the great jazz singer Abbey Lincoln, repairing their relationship and resolving not to buckle under the pressures imposed by a racist society. But the modern viewer is aware that, between the making of the film and its release, a group of white supremacists dynamited a Birmingham church, killing four schoolgirls in one of the most terrible atrocities of the civil rights era.
That was how the world was when Cassius Clay encountered Elijah Muhammad, Malcolm X and the Nation of Islam, changed his name to Muhammad Ali, and forced the whole world, from boxing promoters to the president of the United States, to deal with the meaning of his gesture.
"You see him fighting for his principles," said Attallah Shabazz, Malcolm X's daughter, after seeing the film in Louisville, with Ali and his wife, Lonnie, also in the audience. Those principles continue to make him a worldwide symbol of resistance to oppression and discrimination.
Muhammad Ali's Greatest Fight was funded by HBO, which will broadcast it in the US on Saturday night, to be followed on Wednesday by a UK screening on Sky Atlantic. Nothing But a Man has just begun a run at the BFI. It was my luck to see the two films on the same evening, which is something that might never happen again – although it should, and not just by coincidence.

Should UK aid money be propping up private schools in developing countries?

MDG : low-cost private schools : Students at school in Sogakofe, Ghana
School pupils in Sogakope, Ghana. Public education in the west African country is in urgent need of investment. Photograph: Alamy
In the past three years the Department for International Development (DfID) has made the controversial move to support low-cost privateschools in countries such as Nigeria, Ghana and Pakistan, where public education systems are in desperate need of investment.
In so doing DfID is following in the ideological footsteps of the World Bank. Indeed, a recent DfID guidance note on low-cost private education argues that these schools have a key role to play, despite acknowledging the "lack of data and comparative analysis on education outcomes to assess value for money". So is it a good use of UK taxpayers' money to invest speculatively in for-profit private schools in poor countries?
Low-cost private schools thrive in specific contexts. They flourish in illegal slum settlements in marginal urban areas, where governments fail to provide public schools because they do not recognise the settlements. Yet most slum dwellers would prefer their governments to open schools, and we should support this.
They arise, too, in other contexts where government services are largely absent, such as in rural Pakistan. Analysis shows this is the result of a lack of investment in education. Pakistan spends only 2.4% of its gross domestic product on education against a benchmark of good practice of 6%. In this context, DfID ought to be making the case for increased national investment as the only sustainable solution.
UK aid is supposed to be focused on ending extreme poverty. Support for low-cost private schools contradicts this. In fact, these schools exacerbate inequality. DfID concedes that in India, "no schools charging below $8 [£5] are able to perform well". For parents with four children living on a dollar a day, a fee of $8 a month or more per child remains out of reach.
In such contexts, parents may choose to send just one child to the low-cost school – usually boys, not girls and children with disabilities. DfID says: "Evidence does suggest there are serious equity and choice barriers associated with the growth of low-cost private schools." But it seems these concerns are not enough to halt new DfID investments.
The biggest gains in education in recent years occurred when governments eliminated school fees to deliver on the right to education. This has led to tens of millions of children enrolling in school for the first time. Supporting low-cost private schools flies in the face of this evidence.
A recent survey in Ghana found that of 450 children enrolled in low-cost private schools, 449 were previously enrolled in government schools – which will face a spiral of underinvestment. Even the private schools with the lowest fees will not help extend access to the 57 million children worldwide not at school.
Successful expansion of enrolment in public schools has often led to a dip in quality. Proponents of low-cost private schools argue they offer a model of better quality, but. their evidence is contested and inconclusive.
Proponents tend to be selective in quoting what is often flawed and superficial research on improved learning outcomes. The biggest problem is that most comparative studies fail to consider the socioeconomic status of children or the motivation of parents. This latter point is crucial, as mothers and fathers who opt to pay for their child's schooling have evidently prioritised education and are, therefore, more likely provide a supportive environment at home, which is a key determinant of educational success.
The main argument for causality of any (flawed) claims of difference in learning outcomes tends to point to teacher attendance and school accountability. Private schools make a difference by ensuring that teachers are in the classroom and that schools are accountable to parents, say proponents. If so, the coherent response should be to invest in these within the public system, expanding and improving teacher training and support, making school inspectorates work effectively, and strengthening school-management committees.
Such investments yield systemic, nationwide returns in improving quality – a much more strategic and effective use of public money. Thankfully, most DfID funding for education is spent on such efforts.
We urgently need to improve the quality of public schools, and this needs concerted attention and support, rather than toying with unproven and divisive experiments.
If a public education system is broken, it needs fixing. For many years, DfID has been a global leader in supporting public education reform through the Global Partnership for Education. Let us hope they do not break the broad global consensus on education reform by pursuing ideological distractions that threaten to undermine the right to education

Typhoon Fitow slams into China

At least two people were reported killed, both near Wenzhou in Zhejiang province, the state news agency Xinhua said.
Parts of Zhejiang, which neighbours the commercial hub Shanghai, saw nearly 29 centimetres  of rain over 17 hours from Sunday to early Monday, while areas in Fujian to the south saw up to 16 centimetres, the official China News Service said.
In the hard-hit Cangnan county in Wenzhou, more than 1,200 homes collapsed and damages amounted to hundreds of millions of yuan, China National Radio said.
One of the victims, 55-year-old Ni Wenlin, died “after strong wind blew him off a hill” late Sunday, Xinhua said, citing municipal flood control authorities.
In Fujian the typhoon broke electricity poles in half, leaving power lines on the ground, and bent iron roadsigns out of shape, CNR reported.
In the coastal city of Ningde, a village leader told the Beijing Times that huge waves had damaged a 200-hectare seaweed farm, which nearly 100 families depended on for their livelihood.
The typhoon “broke the bamboo poles holding the seaweed in place”, said Lin Fangqin.
The storm is expected to move northwest but “weaken quickly”, Xinhua said on Monday, citing the National Meteorological Centre (NMC).
Authorities evacuated hundreds of thousands of people and issued China’s highest alert on Sunday as Fitow approached the mainland.
The NMC issued a red alert for the storm, which was packing winds of up to 151 kilometres an hour late Sunday night as it moved towards the coast.
Winds rose to 201 km per hour in parts of Wenzhou, the official Xinhua news agency reported later, citing local flood control authorities.
Zhejiang has so far evacuated more than 574,000 people, while in Fujian 177,000 have been displaced, Xinhua said.
Two port workers in Wenzhou were missing and may have fallen into the sea, the agency added.
Zhejiang governor Li Qiang urged local authorities to increase inspections of dams and reservoirs as well as safety checks of chemical plants and other important facilities, Xinhua reported.
The storm also forced the suspension of bullet train services in several cities in Zhejiang, Fujian and Jiangxi provinces, Xinhua said.
Wenzhou’s airport cancelled 27 flights Sunday, the agency said.
Xinhua quoted the weather centre as saying it was unusual for a typhoon to come ashore in China’s southeast during October, at the end of the storm season.
Chinese maritime authorities also issued red alerts, warning of storm tides and waves, with fishermen urged to return to port and local authorities told to prepare harbour facilities and sea walls for high tides.
In Zhejiang more than 35,000 boats returned to harbour while in Fujian nearly 30,000 vessels were called back, according to Xinhua.
Named after a flower from Micronesia, Fitow has hit just two weeks after Typhoon Usagi wreaked havoc in the region, leaving at least 25 reported dead in southern China.
Fitow, which Xinhua described as the 23rd storm to hit China this year, earlier passed through Japan’s southern Okinawan island chain, forcing flight cancellations and causing power outages.
Taiwan’s Central Weather Bureau had issued a warning over the storm Sunday morning as it surged past the north of the island.
A total of 103 international flights were cancelled in Taiwan, while 14 flights were delayed. Seventeen ferry services between Taiwan and offshore islands were also halted.
Japan was bracing for another storm Monday, Typhoon Danas, which is on course to hit the archipelago.
Packing winds of up to 180 kilometres per hour near its centre, Danas was churning northwest towards the southern Okinawa island chain Monday morning.
More than 50 flights at Naha airport were cancelled while schools in Okinawa were shut, according to local media.
It was estimated to be 200 kilometres south of Naha, the capital city of Okinawa, at 0200 GMT and was expected to reach a point off the western coast of Kyushu island by early Tuesday.

Ranbir Kapoor finally speaks........

He is all set to produce Jagga Jasoos with Anurag Basu. PHOTO: FILE
Ranbir Kapoor is all set to make his debut as a producer with Jagga Jasoos and Picture Shuru Productions alongside Anurag Basu. However, he is not eager to kick off his production career under grandfather Raj Kapoor’s R.K. Films banner. In an earlier interview, he admitted that production is not “his place” despite having taken on the project. In a more recent chat with the Hindustan Times, the 30-year-old actor confessed that he is not sure if he wants to revive his grandfather banner.
“I don’t believe in this fact that I need to rekindle the R.K. Films banner,” says Ranbir, whose latest release Besharam has received quite a bashing from critics. “R.K Films is right up there in the ‘Greats of Indian Cinema’ and I wouldn’t like to touch it or spoil it or take advantage of it. If I do something, I will create something of my own so that if my children are working in movies, they don’t have to have anyone’s shadow. Raj Kapoor is too big a name to have a shadow.”
He then shares his reservations. “I have realised that I don’t know if I really want to make films under our R.K. Films banner. It’s synonymous with Raj Kapoor. It’s his banner and his creation. I can’t live up to his vision.”
He adds that he wants to collaborate with directors as a producer, which is why he is producing a movie with Anurag Basu.
“We are equal partners in it. It’s called Picture Shuru. If I want to produce films with Ayan Mukerji, I will probably call it something else,” he said.

Beckhams Sell Bechingham Palace

David Beckham with baby Harper. PHOTO: REUTERS
LONDON: Former soccer player David Beckham and his wife Victoria have reportedly sold Beckingham Palace and a fleet of cars for 12 million pounds to raise funds to buy a 45 million pounds mansion.
They raised their sons Brooklyn, 14, Romeo, 11, and Cruz, eight, in the house, and it is said that the retired soccer legend is desperately sad to sell the house, reports contactmusic.com.
“David in particular was desperately sad to sell the family home as there are so many memories,” The Sun newspaper quoted a source as saying.
“They have had years of happiness in the home, but practically now there is no need to keep it. It’s the beginning of a new era for the family,” added the source.
The home and several cars have been sold as the couple look to raise their family, including their two-year-old daughter Harper, here and take them to Los Angeles for the school holidays.
“The Beckhams love both England and LA. They want the Californian sunshine for the kids, but the education system of UK – so they’re getting the best of both worlds. It’s an exciting time for the Beckhams as they enter a new chapter of family life,” the source said.

Chelsea........................................................

Sending Hazard and Willian as second-half substitutes turned out to be a master stroke by Mourinho as both scored late goals to hand Chelsea a 3-1 win over Norwich yesterday. PHOTOS: AFP
NORWICH: Eden Hazard and Willian rose from the bench to score late goals that earned Chelsea a 3-1 win away to Norwich City in the Premier League yesterday.
The substitutes netted in the 85th and 86th minutes to end Norwich’s legitimate hopes of winning the game themselves after Anthony Pilkington had cancelled out Oscar’s early opener for the visitors.
The visitors took a fourth-minute lead when Oscar drilled home from Demba Ba’s lay-off, but Norwich gradually took the upper hand.
Chelsea manager Jose Mourinho reacted by sending on Hazard and Willian, and it proved a masterstroke.
Hazard completed an 85th-minute counter-attack with a low shot that squirmed beneath John Ruddy to put Chelsea ahead before Willian curled home a glorious left-foot shot a minute later to claim his first goal for the club.
Moyes confident Januzaj will stay at United
David Moyes insists he’s relaxed over the future of Adnan Januzaj after the teenage midfielder marked his full Premier League debut with both goals as Manchester United fought back to win 2-1 at Sunderland.
Januzaj’s representatives have resumed talks over an improved new deal for the 18-year-old, after negotiations stalled following the departure from Old Trafford of Alex Ferguson earlier this year.
The dual nationality Belgian and Albanian prospect’s contract expires at the end of the season, with his agent claiming interest from a string of top clubs all over Europe.
“I’m not too worried about that (contract situation) because every young boy wants to play for Manchester United,” said Moyes. “If I was a young player, I don’t see anywhere better to play, we’re a club that promotes young players and I’m a manager who does that.
“If I was the dad of a young boy who was good enough to play at this level, I could see there was a chance of getting in our team. That’s part of my remit.”
Rodgers demands more from deadly duo
Liverpool manager Brendan Rodgers insists Luis Suarez and Daniel Sturridge can get even better after his in-form strikers inspired the Reds to a 3-1 win against Crystal Palace.
Suarez and Sturridge both scored within the opening 17 minutes before Steven Gerrard netted his 99th Premier League goal with a penalty before half-time at Anfield.
Uruguay striker Suarez has 19 goals in his last 22 games, while England forward Sturridge has 19 in 24 games since joining in January, including eight in nine matches this season, and Rodgers was quick to praise their partnership.
“The two boys up front are as good as any in the league, so you know you’re always going to be in with a chance with them,” said Rodgers.

Nadal Vs Djokovic..

Djokovic held his serve throughout the match clinching the title in just 87 minutes. PHOTO: AFP
BEIJING: World number one Novak Djokovic overcame Spain’s Rafael Nadal in straight sets yesterday to win the China Open and maintain a remarkable 100 percent record in the Beijing tournament.
The defending champion, who has won the event the four times he has entered, was at his ruthless best to defeat Nadal 6-3, 6-4, a day before he is set to be unseated at the top of the world rankings by the number two Spaniard.
The result was Nadal’s first hard court loss of the season.
The victory represents a sweet one for Djokovic, who is spending his 101st week at number one, and will have his current streak of 48 weeks end today with the announcement of the new ATP rankings with Nadal at the top.
The Spaniard only needed to make the final to unseat him.
After the match, Djokovic congratulated Nadal on his achievement.
“I have to say congratulations to Rafael because he deserves definitely to be number one of the world this year with the season that he has had,” he said.
“He is the best player so far in 2013, there is no question about it. I am just very happy to be able to continue to play well and hopefully I can maintain the rhythm.”
Nadal has had the beating of Djokovic this season, coming out on top at the semi-finals at Roland Garros and last month’s final at the US Open, as well as the Canada Masters.
But he said that Djokovic was ‘too strong’ for him in Beijing at the serve. Nadal did not break his opponent throughout the match.
“I didn’t play my best match,” said the Spaniard. “But he played at a greater level with his serve. I was not able to have any chance when I was returning during the whole match.”
Nadal’s return to the top for the first time since July 2011 marks an astonishing comeback for the 13-time Grand Slam champion, who spent the second half of last year on the sidelines injured.
Heading into the match at Beijing’s National Tennis Centre, the pair had played each other 37 times, with Nadal leading the rivalry 22-15